Childrens Writers - Random House
Subject: Childrens Writers - Random House
Author: writerbabe
Uploaded By: JOANWRITE
Date: 1/7/2000
File: CHILDR~6.LOG (17094 bytes)
Estimated Download Time (17541 baud): < 1 minute
Download Count: 52
Equipment: whatever got you here
Needs: word processor/ text reader
Guest: Wendy Loggia, Random House editor
Tuesdays
9 p.m. ET (6 p.m. PT), Writers Workshop
Children's Writers chat - writers and illustrators of children's books meet for specific topics and special guest speakers, moderated by HOST WRTR WBABE & HOST WRTR CGaley, with HOST WRTR sUe & HOST WRTR Neely (Greeters).
***file disinfected using Anti-Virus 7.8***
<HTML><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10>1-4-00 Childrens Writers Chat Log<BR>
Guest: Wendy Loggia, Random House editor<BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
Neely f: Okay folks--Time to go into protocol . . .<BR>
JOANWRITE: thanks, sue. Hey, donna & Marilyn, I'm logging.<BR>
Neely f: That means, when it's time for That means, when it's time for<BR>
audience participation,<BR>
Neely f: type ? for a question, ! for a comment,<BR>
Neely f: and wait your turn in the queue to be called on.<BR>
Neely f: Type GA (guests, too) for "Go Ahead" when you have finished<BR>
speaking.<BR>
Neely f: Now . . . it is my great pleasure to welcome Wendy Loggia,<BR>
Neely f: editor at Random House Children's Books.<BR>
Larsonlog: Hi, everybody!<BR>
Neely f: I had the pleasure of meeting Wendy last year when she was a<BR>
speaker<BR>
Neely f: or an SCBWI conference in New Jersey.<BR>
Neely f: Welcome, Wendy.<BR>
Neely f: Would you like to make an opening statement or do you<BR>
Larsonlog: Hi! I'm happy to be here and please feel free to fire away any<BR>
and all<BR>
Neely f: wish me to go right into questions?<BR>
Neely f: ga<BR>
Larsonlog: publishing questions! GA<BR>
Jgregers: ?<BR>
Neely f: Yes, publishig questions.<BR>
JOANWRITE: ?<BR>
Neely f: Folks hold on to questions until the floor opens up.<BR>
JOANWRITE: (sorry, thought it was open. oops)<BR>
Neely f: Wendy, are you the primary reader of your slushpile,<BR>
Neely f: or do you have readers sift through the pile first? ga<BR>
Larsonlog: Yes, anything addressed to me I read. We don't have assts. GA<BR>
JanssD: ?<BR>
Neely f: Wendy, can you tell us about a typical day in the publishing world?<BR>
Larsonlog: Well, not much time is spent reading! A lot of meetings, and<BR>
trying to get approvals on<BR>
Neely f: What are your favorite things to do? What are your least favorite?<BR>
ga<BR>
Larsonlog: things from our ed. in.chief.<BR>
Larsonlog: My favorite is probably line-editing or reading a great new ms.<BR>
Larsonlog: My least fave. is filing! ga<BR>
Neely f: lol<BR>
Neely f: SI it true what we hear that mss. must go through a vast amount of<BR>
approval before they are<BR>
Neely f: accepted? Like marketing? ga<BR>
Larsonlog: It depends, really. For series, marketing support is extremely<BR>
important<BR>
Larsonlog: -- for a hardcover, we don't need that initial stamp of approval.<BR>
ga<BR>
Neely f: What is the time frame--in publishing?<BR>
Neely f: How long can one expect to wait from contract to book shelf? ga<BR>
Larsonlog: Right now I'm doing 2 rush books for fall 2000 that we don't have<BR>
contracts<BR>
Larsonlog: for yet. That's unusual, though. Usually, about a year and a<BR>
half, I'd say. ga<BR>
Neely f: That does seem rather unusual. Can you comment on the nature of<BR>
that? ga<BR>
Larsonlog: Sure. Both projects are with well-known adult authors, already<BR>
proven commodities, if you<BR>
Larsonlog: will. So, the contract details are a bit more tricky to work out<BR>
Larsonlog: but we know we want to do the books and we need to get working on<BR>
them<BR>
Larsonlog: now if they're going to be out for Oct. 2000. I still can't<BR>
believe we're going to make our<BR>
Larsonlog: deadlines! But usually, when I sign a book up, I want to publish<BR>
Larsonlog: it as soon as possible, but it does take at least a year under<BR>
Larsonlog: normal circumstances. We need time to plan the design, layout,<BR>
and make sure<BR>
Larsonlog: we have bound galleys to send to our sales reps, telling them<BR>
about this wonderful new book<BR>
Larsonlog: we're publishing. I acquired a book in March 1998 that's coming<BR>
out in Oct. 2000--that's my<BR>
Larsonlog: latest HC acquisition to pub. ga<BR>
WriterBabe: What are these books about? Are they children's books? [co-host<BR>
butting in here]<BR>
Larsonlog: The 2 rush books are both nonfiction books, really for all ages<BR>
(I'd tell you more but<BR>
Larsonlog: since we don't have contracts, I can't) . . . the other is a<BR>
great middle grade<BR>
Larsonlog: called THE HIDDEN ARROW that came out of a writer's conference I<BR>
attended in March 1998.<BR>
Larsonlog: Oops, up above I should have said I acquired THE HIDDEN ARROW in<BR>
Larsonlog: March 1999. Still getting used to the new year!<BR>
Larsonlog: ga<BR>
Neely f: Wendy that sounds like an author/illustrator dream, if not an<BR>
editor's nightmare.<BR>
Neely f: I mean the two rush books.<BR>
Neely f: Can you outline the conception to birth process of a book?<BR>
Neely f: For example, once the contract is signed--what comes next?<BR>
Neely f: From phone call to editing?? ga<BR>
Larsonlog: Depending on whether an idea or manuscript was acquired, I will<BR>
sit down and write an<BR>
Larsonlog: editorial letter with my thoughts on how I envision the book, and<BR>
what I think<BR>
Larsonlog: could be done, really opening a dialogue between the writer and<BR>
myself. Then, it's usually<BR>
Caribooboy: ?<BR>
Larsonlog: back and forth with edit. letters and then manuscripts. Depending<BR>
on the project, it can<BR>
Larsonlog: take up to 4 or 5 revisions before the book is ready to go to our<BR>
copyediting<BR>
Larsonlog: dept. and then is typeset. Of course, this is a nutshell. ga<BR>
Neely f: Thank you.<BR>
Neely f: Wendy, approximately how long does it take for you to respond on a<BR>
manuscript?<BR>
Neely f: One that you find in the slushpile?<BR>
Neely f: ga<BR>
Larsonlog: I'm blushing now. Well, my goal is 2-3 months, and I'd like this<BR>
to be my new year's<BR>
Larsonlog: resolution. Sometimes it does take up to 6 months.<BR>
Larsonlog: Usually I put aside things I like but then I need to reread them<BR>
Larsonlog: and the whole process takes longer than it should, really. I do<BR>
Larsonlog: feel for people who are waiting for a response. I know it's<BR>
rough. ga<BR>
Neely f: So, in fact, if a manuscript is out a long time that may be a good<BR>
omen?<BR>
Neely f: ga<BR>
Larsonlog: Yes. But if it's been a long time, don't hesitate to send a note<BR>
in asking<BR>
Larsonlog: about the ms.'s status. Unfortunately, things do get misplaced.<BR>
ga<BR>
Neely f: Wendy, if you like a manuscript but are unable to make an offer for<BR>
it,<BR>
Neely f: do you ever indicate to the author any specific reasons<BR>
Neely f: why you are not making an offer?<BR>
Neely f: I realize that your time is limited, but if you see promise ina<BR>
writer's work would you<BR>
Larsonlog: Oh, yes. Every time. That is, I always say what I like, and what<BR>
I think<BR>
Neely f: somehow indicate it? ga<BR>
Larsonlog: could be improved. I always offer encouragement to those writers<BR>
who<BR>
Larsonlog: I feel show promise. And you know, it's a small portion of those<BR>
writers whom I actually<BR>
Larsonlog: hear from again. It can be discouraging, and I do wonder, what<BR>
did he/she think<BR>
Larsonlog: of my comments? Editors want to hear back from those people. ga<BR>
Neely f: That's very encouraging. I think I speak for many writers. we do<BR>
appreciate that bit of<BR>
Neely f: encouragement.<BR>
Neely f: Wendy, is there a particular type or genre of book that you prefer?<BR>
Neely f: picture books, easy readers, middle grade, young adult, mystery,<BR>
fantasy? ga<BR>
GLuvsCats: hi all<BR>
Larsonlog: Lots, really. Middle grade and young adult fiction is what I most<BR>
want to<BR>
Neely f: GLuv we are in a meeting.<BR>
WriterBabe: [We are in protocol GLuvs and have a guest]<BR>
DollyB105: Hi room<BR>
Larsonlog: acquire, along with picturebooks. We aren't acquiring<BR>
easy-to-reads. I love humor (which is<BR>
Neely f: Dolly, we are in a meeting .<BR>
Larsonlog: really hard to find), quirky and traditional romance, mysteries,<BR>
and historicals.<BR>
Larsonlog: But my interests are varied. ga<BR>
Neely f: Wendy, can you name some of your favorite books--<BR>
Neely f: both that you have edited and those that you may not have,<BR>
Neely f: but are particularly fond of? ga<BR>
Larsonlog: I'm a big fan of Gail Carson Levine--Ella Enchanted & Dave at<BR>
Night.<BR>
Neely f: I loved Ella.<BR>
Larsonlog: Of books I've edited, the Clearwater Crossing series is near and<BR>
dear to my heart; I work<BR>
Larsonlog: so closely with the writer, and it's going on 4 years now. We<BR>
have 18 books lined up. Then<BR>
Larsonlog: I'd have to say A.M. Jenkins's BREAKING BOXES, a searingly<BR>
beautifully written ya novel<BR>
Larsonlog: which I edited, so I can't gush too much here. But really the<BR>
credit was<BR>
Larsonlog: all to the writer. Let's see, what else. Oh, the timeless ones.<BR>
Charlotte's Web, of course.<BR>
Larsonlog: And my all time favorite book as a child, other than LITTLE<BR>
WOMEN, was a quirky title called<BR>
Larsonlog: LORETTA MASON POTTS by Mary Chase that I recently bought<BR>
Larsonlog: on Amazon!<BR>
Neely f: Wow, what a varied lot. ga<BR>
Larsonlog: I also love Katherine Applegate's ANIMORPHS and EVERWORLD . . .<BR>
my guilty pleasure! ga<BR>
Caribooboy: ?<BR>
Neely f: Wendy, are you more apt to look at a writer's work<BR>
Neely f: if they have been previously published?<BR>
Neely f: ga<BR>
Larsonlog: Not particularly, unless they are someone with a "name" or have<BR>
been<BR>
Larsonlog: published by a well-known house. It's always nice to discover<BR>
talent on your own. ga<BR>
Neely f: Wendy, when you consider signing an author or an illustrator,<BR>
Neely f: do you look at the project as a one book deal,<BR>
Neely f: or are you more inclined to sign someone whom you feel<BR>
Neely f: is more likely to have a writing/illustrating career?<BR>
Neely f: ga<BR>
Larsonlog: Speaking for Random House, we always want to establish<BR>
relationships with our<BR>
Larsonlog: writers. It's not always apparent if a writer has more than one<BR>
book in them, so to say,<BR>
Larsonlog: but it's something to hope for. I have long relationships with<BR>
several of my authors, and I<BR>
Larsonlog: feel a real connection to them and their projects. It's an honor,<BR>
really. ga<BR>
Neely f: It's something that all writers dream of, I'm sure.<BR>
Neely f: Wendy, do you enjoy the editing process of a book?<BR>
Larsonlog: I do. It's the best part of my job. ga<BR>
Neely f: Folks, I am going to open the floor for questions in just a moment.<BR>
Please have your questi<BR>
Neely f: questions ready.<BR>
Caribooboy: ?<BR>
WriterBabe: I'd like to butt in first, Donna.<BR>
Neely f: I was going to lead you in Marliyn.<BR>
CER 3201: ?<BR>
Neely f: Wendy, what do you feel are the attributes of a good book?<BR>
WriterBabe: Thanks, Donna.<BR>
Larsonlog: Well-developed, interesting characters with a strong voice.<BR>
That's the most important thing<BR>
Larsonlog: of all. Originality, a fresh approach, etc. All are important but<BR>
the characters are it for<BR>
Larsonlog: me. ga<BR>
Neely f: Marilyn has a few questions then we will open the floor.<BR>
WriterBabe: Thanks again.<BR>
WriterBabe: Wendy, you edit series. What makes a successful series?<BR>
WriterBabe: How does one pitch a series to you? GA<BR>
Larsonlog: A strong hook. If you can't summarize a series in one sentence,<BR>
then it won't be a success.<BR>
Larsonlog: The idea itself, along with sketches for the first 6 books or so<BR>
. . . it depends on who<BR>
Larsonlog: is pitching. If it's someone who has done a lot of series work,<BR>
that would<BR>
Larsonlog: differ from a novice. It's really difficult to come up with new<BR>
series ideas today. ga<BR>
WriterBabe: The TV synopsis approach!!! Good advice.<BR>
WriterBabe: You also do books about celebrities. Who writes these? <BR>
WriterBabe: How does one get such a writing gig? GA<BR>
Larsonlog: It's nice work! Grace Catalano has done several celebrity books<BR>
for us, and I believe<BR>
Larsonlog: she came out of the Teen Beat/Tiger World magazine world.<BR>
Basically these books are<BR>
Larsonlog: usually rushes, and we need to use writers who can deliver the<BR>
goods quickly. One of our<BR>
Larsonlog: former editors wrote our best-selling NSYNC book from last year.<BR>
ga<BR>
WriterBabe: Do folks write to you or call and say they want to do celebrity<BR>
books? GA<BR>
Larsonlog: Not usually, unless they have a special connection to a<BR>
celebrity. Usually we come up with<BR>
Larsonlog: the idea, for example, we did a Leonardo DiCaprio book, and we<BR>
called up Grace and asked if<BR>
Larsonlog: she would be interested in the project. ga<BR>
WriterBabe: But a writer could send you a resume and get in your "stable,"<BR>
yes?<BR>
WriterBabe: GA<BR>
Larsonlog: Sure. ga<BR>
WriterBabe: Last question from me--and it's similar.<BR>
WriterBabe: What about films novelizations--how does one get such a job? GA<BR>
Larsonlog: Again, same story, really. I've done quite a few myself, and I<BR>
"broke in" by working<BR>
Larsonlog: in publishing and working on tie-ins as part of my job. I've done<BR>
2 novels in the past 2<BR>
Larsonlog: years for Bantam. Most people doing tie-ins have some connection<BR>
to the publishing house or<BR>
BOEDEN: ~ © ~ © ~ 15 MINUTE WARNING ~ © ~ © ~<BR>
Larsonlog: are recommended by the film studio as someone to work with. ga<BR>
WriterBabe: Thanks, Wendy. Donna--back to you.<BR>
Neely f: Jgregers you will be first tonight.<BR>
Neely f: (Folks, please have your questions ready to type to screen.)<BR>
WriterRoss: ??<BR>
Neely f: Jg, are you there?<BR>
Jgregers: do you judge for the Delacorte and can you tell us some of the<BR>
process for that.<BR>
Jgregers: and a URL? GA<BR>
Larsonlog: Several editors screen the manuscripts, and sometimes I do and<BR>
sometimes not.<BR>
Larsonlog: Then, when it's whittled down to 30 or so, they're dispersed to<BR>
the editors, and I read 3 or<BR>
Larsonlog: 4 and hopefully find one or two that I like. Then, 4 or 5<BR>
finalists are chosen, and we hold<BR>
Larsonlog: a meeting to select a winner and runner-up if need be. For<BR>
information, send an SASE to:<BR>
Larsonlog: Random House Children's, 1540 B'way, NYC 10036. No faxes or phone<BR>
calls, please. ga<BR>
Neely f: JOANWRITE, you are up next.<BR>
JOANWRITE: Are you overloaded with easy to reads? Is that the main reason<BR>
you aren't acquiring? When do<BR>
JOANWRITE: you estimate you'll begin reading ETR mss. again? ga<BR>
Larsonlog: Our easy-to-read program at Bantam DOubleday Dell was not a<BR>
success. However, now that we<BR>
Larsonlog: are Random House, things may change. They publish the very<BR>
successful Stepping<BR>
Larsonlog: Stones program. I can't say when we'll be looking at ETR's again.<BR>
ga<BR>
JOANWRITE: Thanks<BR>
Neely f: Caibooboy, next question, please.<BR>
Caribooboy: Thank you. Wendy, Mallory Loehr...is she still the contact for<BR>
picture book ms's + queries?<BR>
Caribooboy: ga<BR>
BOEDEN: ~~~~~~ 10 MINUTE WARNING ~~~~~~<BR>
Larsonlog: I don' t know . . . see, Bantam Doubleday Dell merged with Random<BR>
House and adopted their<BR>
Larsonlog: name. Mallory is from RH, and I'm a BDD person. From our end, I'm<BR>
happy to look at picture<BR>
Larsonlog: book mss., as is Francoise Bui and Karen Wojtyla. Mallory may as<BR>
well, but I can't speak for<BR>
Larsonlog: her. The RH staff from the east side will be moving in to our<BR>
building this coming weekend.<BR>
Larsonlog: Our merger is finally happening! ga<BR>
Caribooboy: Thank you. Wendy, do you accept multiple submissions? ga<BR>
Neely f: CER 3201, you are next.<BR>
CER 3201: Do I need an agent to send in a ms to Random House? Do I send a<BR>
query letter? GA<BR>
Caribooboy: oops\<BR>
Larsonlog: Yes, I accept multiples. No, you don't need an agent, but you<BR>
should send it to a specific<BR>
Larsonlog: editor for the best chance at getting read. Yes, send a query. ga<BR>
Neely f: OOps, Cari, I didn't reaaize you had a second question. I will put<BR>
you back in the que.<BR>
Neely f: WriterRoss .<BR>
WriterRoss: Why are funny books hard to find?! Why do editors love funny<BR>
voices in books? (I'm glad..);><BR>
WriterRoss: Thanks--Pamela Ross<BR>
WriterRoss: GA<BR>
Larsonlog: That's an easy one . . . kids love to laugh and we want to<BR>
entertain kids! And I guess it's<BR>
Neely f: After WriterRoss the que is open. Please post your ? for<BR>
questions.<BR>
GwynnaL: ?<BR>
Husky 7: ?<BR>
Larsonlog: hard to be funny in prose . . . it takes a special talent. If any<BR>
of you have the chance to<BR>
Jenny7975: ?<BR>
Larsonlog: read THE AMAZING FRECTACLE, it's quite funny. ga<BR>
MaryP2000: ?<BR>
CER 3201: ?<BR>
WriterRoss: Author?<BR>
Larsonlog: Ross Venokur. His 2nd book is THE COOKIE COMPANY.<BR>
end</HTML>
Comments
Post a Comment