FutureCulture Digest #372

 From ahawks@nyx.cs.du.edu Tue Apr 20 00:42:13 1993

Return-Path: <ahawks@nyx.cs.du.edu>

Received: from relay1.UU.NET by ccu.UManitoba.CA

(4.1/25-eef) id AA08788; Tue, 20 Apr 93 00:42:09 CDT

Received: from nyx.cs.du.edu by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP 

(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA27624; Tue, 20 Apr 93 01:39:52 -0400

Received: by nyx.cs.du.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)

id AA12785; Mon, 19 Apr 93 23:31:28 MDT

From: ahawks@nyx.cs.du.edu (andy)

Message-Id: <9304200531.AA12785@nyx.cs.du.edu>

X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University

of Denver.  The University has neither control over nor

responsibility for the opinions or correct identity of users.

Subject: FutureCulture Digest #372

To: future-digest@nyx.cs.du.edu

Date: Mon, 19 Apr 93 23:31:26 MDT

X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]

Status: O




 ______________________________________________________________________

|______________                        /                               |

|                                     /                                |

|                u  t  u  r  e       <___________  u  l  t  u  r  e    |

_______________________________________________________________________|



Issue #372

Monday, April 19th 1993

 

Today's Topics:

---------------

 

 Medical histories online?

 movie titles

 Re- Cafe Net(BtlTk) Apls&Or

 Re: Re- Cafe Net(Battletech)

 Re: son of film rant

 son of film rant

 You'll Still need Vision

__________________________________________________________________________

 

Subject: movie titles

Date: Mon, 19 Apr 93 19:24:36 EDT

From: Richard Gardner      Ask me about "VARIOUS..." <rgardner@charon.MIT.EDU>


Here are some suggestions/ideas/inspirations for

the prospective Future-Culture movie title:


sex, lies, and news groups

fatal error

rear x-window

gold finger

playboy of the western world.std.com

drag network

everything you always wanted to know about FAQ's but were afraid to ascii

abbott & costello meet frankston

alice in internetland

verb to go

the year of logging in dangerously

the thin manual

the pit and the pendulous

naked gnu II

dial m for mail

butch cassette & the sun os kid

asterisk trek

indianna jones and the temple of domain

panic in echo path

oh calculation!

night gal leri

the good, the bad, and the logged out

aladdin and the magic network

dangerous logins

lawrence of aleph

back to the future culture

teenage mutant ninja terminals

go on with the rant

alice's restaurant at the end of the network

the lone net ranger

clockwork os

asterisk wars

phantom of the os

 

______________________________

 

Date: 19 Apr 1993 20:13:52 U

From: "Michael Maier" <michael_maier@qmgate.anl.gov>

Subject: Re- Cafe Net(BtlTk) Apls&Or


                       Subject:                               Time:7:07 PM

  OFFICE MEMO          Re- Cafe Net(BtlTk) Apls&Orngs         Date:4/19/93


Subject: Re: Re- Cafe Net(Battletech)

On Sun, 18 Apr 93 @12:46:02 PDT Joe Pollock surmises:

 


>It strikes me that this would be contrary to the aims of cafenet, to begin

>with.  A highly interactive VR game would tend to isolate participants >from

>the people around them, 


Like a MUD?


>leaving them in contact with only the other >gamers.

>Seems more appropriate for a dedicated VR/arcade space (which could be 

>another room, of course).  I thought the purpose of cafenet was to >combine


I was thinking an Apples and/or Orange type scenario. Battletech is very

popular and attracts a lot of paying customers. Its self-supporting.  A

_cafenet_ may not be self supporting, but just as enjoyable (or better yet,

differently enjoyable.) Also the people attracted to Battletech type setups

would have a highprobability of being attracted to the _net_.  They may come in

for an apple, but see an orange, try it and like it better (or not.)  I just

thought it was another way to facillitate opening more connections to the

_net_. 


But yes, they are 2 completely seperate activities and I didn't envision them

as the same.


Michael Unscene

cyber and flesh interactions :-)


 

______________________________

 

Date: 19 Apr 1993 20:19:11 U

From: "Michael Maier" <michael_maier@qmgate.anl.gov>

Subject: You'll Still need Vision


                       Subject:                               Time:7:18 PM

  OFFICE MEMO          You'll Still need Vision               Date:4/19/93

On Sun, 18 Apr 1993 16:04:26 -0400 (EDT)

Chris L Concepcion adds:


>Subject: Re: Computer Class  

>Sampling and aesthetics (is techno art, what are the video applications

>of sampling, what's going to happen when you don't need musical virutosity

>to be able to make music?)


You'll still need vision to make those creative decisions (the incisions to cut

the wheat from the chafe.)


As far as sampling check out a film done in 1957 by a filmmaker named Bruce

Conner. The film is called  "A Movie"


Unscene


 

______________________________

 

Date: 19 Apr 1993 21:17:47 -0600 (CST)

From: Scotto <MOORE7004@iscsvax.uni.edu>

Subject: son of film rant


Glad to be back.  First caller, you're on the air.


Chris Conception:

>  But we ain't ILM.  Anyone with the inkling of editing this possible

>Rosetta Stone for the Cutting Edge should take stock of what sort of video

>editing equipment they can access so we know just what we are capable of.


I don't think we need *that* kind of special effects to pull this off.  Anyone

with a video toaster or above can *edit* the thing such that it's an attention

grabber.  Here's a question for all you computer types, though: what kind of

animation programs are you familiar with, etc?  Another question: Terence

McKenna has a video called "The Experiment at Petaluma" which is basically him

sitting in front of a camera talking, but the footage is incredibly distorted,

psychedelic, etc., and it looks very low grade, i.e. something we should be

able to get our hands on.


Are we just spewing memes into the air here with no penultimate payoff, or does

*someone* have some larger kind of knowhow out there?  .rez and I may be able

to get access to a nice-ish (altho' old) VHS editing bay with video toaster,

etc., but it would be great if we could get a bit higher tech.


>Well, there's another idea for the overall format of this flim...


I don't think we're going to end up with one overall format.  I think every

idea you suggested was worthy of consideration, and ultimately, every single

separate group will just shoot what it wants to, and the footage will then be

assembled by the editors.  I like this idea mainly because it basically leaves

everyone unrestricted.  Shoot what you want; it can be staged, real, "cool" or

goofy, whatever. 


Next caller, you're on the air.


Mr G R Evans:

> This one gets my vote - a kind of 'Until The End of The World' scenario.  If

>my opinion's worth anything at all, it seems to me that this one would be the 

>most glacially cool, and the least likely to present the Net as others expect

>it to be presented.  Which, I believe, would be a good aim...


This gets back to one of the main issues that we haven't really discussed: what

in fact *is* the aim of this film?  Is it indeed to present the Net as others

expect it to be presented, or is it, as I've suggested, something more

aesthetically interesting?  I of course have an opinion on this, but I'd like

to see what you all think as well.


Next caller, you're on the air...


Christopher j Heschong:

>Well, there isn't any way to take a straight terminal

>texty type thing and shoot it cool...  So change it.  Make a telnet look

>like that scene in Bill & Ted's [something] adventure where their phone

>boot goes zoomin thru the tubes...  Do something cool like that.  *make*

>it VR lookin.  Otherwise, its gonna look like... well, it's gonna look

>like text (oh gasp of horror)  See?


That'd be great, but, as Chris Conception pointed out, we're not ILM.  I don't

think we have the option to do "Lawnmower Man" graphics, and anyway, that isn't

what the Internet seems to me to be about, at least, not yet.  I think a

grungier looking film would be more appropriate, but that's just my preference.

And I think text will work provided it interacts with live action in just the

right way, which again, depends on the cinematographers and then on the

editors.  And I think this won't be a problem; we're all creative types. :)


Yeehah...


 

______________________________

 

From: Meng Weng Wong <mengwong@pobox.upenn.edu>

Subject: Re: son of film rant

Date: Mon, 19 Apr 93 23:09:35 EDT


Scotto pounds randomly on the keyboard and comes up with

| [...]

| And I think text will work provided it interacts with live action in just the

| right way, which again, depends on the cinematographers and then on the

| editors.  And I think this won't be a problem; we're all creative types. :)


yeah, throw in some of that "Slacker look-n-feel" ... especially the bit

in the middle with the amateur videocameras - a film about filming a film

about itself.


fs

 

______________________________

 

Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1993 22:43:49 EDT

From: sylvar@ufcc.ufl.edu

Subject: Medical histories online?


Greetings, FC'ers...

     As I filled out the Nth medical case history form in as many days, I began

to wonder whether it might not be simpler, indeed better, to be able to call up

a patient's history on a MediNet.  Of course, privacy of documents could at

best be protected by a personal password, but it's my feeling that someone who

wants my case history is going to get it if he wants it badly enough.

     Has anyone heard of such a network?  Maybe the HMOs would like to get in

the act... Think of it.  "Nurse, would you please download the patient

's history and x-rays?"


---------- Bottom line: What do you think?

 

 _________________________________________________________________________

|                                                                         |

|  That's all for today!                                                  |

|  To send a message to the list:           future@nyx.cs.du.edu          |

|  To subscribe/unsubscribe/change format:  future-request@nyx.cs.du.edu  |

|  All other requests:                      future-request@nyx.cs.du.edu  |

|  List Maintainer is: (andy [aka hawkeye]) ahawks@nyx.cs.du.edu          |

|_________________________________________________________________________|

|                                                                         |

|  The opinions expressed in FutureCulture are those of the individual    |

|  author only.                                                           |

|_________________________________________________________________________|



 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BOTTOM LIVE script

Evidence supporting quantum information processing in animals

ARMIES OF CHAOS