THE RESONANT VELOCITY OF SPACE
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
May 15, 1992
VELOCITY.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Robert Hinkelman.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
THE RESONANT VELOCITY OF SPACE
by Rick Andersen
A Keelynet listing called GRAVITY2.ZIP (10/17/90) presented an
unpublished paper by John R. Majka called "A Different Point of
View".
There the hypothesis was set forth that the ratio of magnetic-to-
electric field "seen" by an observer of a charged particle is a
function of the relative motion between the particle and observer.
Also, that the magnetic permeability of free space and the electric
permittivity thereof are analogous to the distributed inductance and
capacitance, respectively, of a transmission line.
This leads to the suggestion that a transmission line's RESONANCE,
which depends on its inductance (L) and capacitance (C), corresponds
to a RESONANT VELOCITY of free space, that velocity being the speed
of light (2.998E8 meters/sec). For the implications of this
hypothesis, see the file GRAVITY2.ZIP.
This file serves as an addendum to J. Majka's paper. Evidently
Majka is not the first to seriously consider the "resonant velocity"
idea.
In 1986, Prentice-Hall, Inc. published a college-level textbook
entitled "Waveforms: a modern guide to nonsinusoidal waves and
nonlinear processes", by Homer B. Tilton (ISBN 0-13-946096-9).
On page 66 Tilton introduces the concept of "super resonance", in
which he discusses a dual oscillator system (two pendulums). On
page 67 he illustrates a theoretical electrical version of the dual
pendulums-- dual L-C tank circuits coupled together through back-to-
back zener diodes.
Tilton claims that, if the resonant circuits are excited in their
linear regions, below a certain threshold, each L-C tank (or
pendulum) will oscillate at its own independent resonant frequency.
But when they are OVERDRIVEN into the nonlinear region, they will
act as if they had been tuned to a higher frequency simply as a
Page 1
result of the NEW MODE OF EXCITATION. I now quote directly from
Tilton,pp. 67,68:
"THE 'RESONANT SPEED OF SPACE'
The constancy of the speed of light in free space leads to the
now-classic equation of special relativity, gamma=(1-beta^2)
^(-1/2), which describes relativistic effects, with beta being
'normalized velocity'. Among these effects are 'space
contraction', 'time dilation', and 'mass increase with
velocity'.
That equation for gamma can be 'explained' by likening the
speed of light in free space to a resonance condition.
"An electronic circuit analogy was announced by Schelkunoff
in 1938 [footnote 1] in which it was shown that the intrinsic
impedance of free space is analogous to the characteristic
impedance of a network, and the Q of a lossy medium is
analogous to the Q of a network. That analog is in common use
today in antenna design.
"That electronic circuit analogy has been developed further by
the author [Tilton] in accordance with the ideas that the
permittivity and permeability of free space are analogous to
the capacitance and inductance, respectively, of a tuned
circuit. In this extension of the analogy, the speed of light
becomes analogous to the resonant frequency of a tuned circuit
[footnote 2].
"While apparently it is not possible to decrease the value of
either the permittivity or permeability of free space and
thereby 'tune' it to a higher 'resonant speed', the following
question nevertheless presents itself: Can a region of free
space be EFFECTIVELY tuned to a higher resonant speed by
exciting it in the manner of the binary systems described
above? This question remains unanswered." [End quote]
So we see that John Majka seems to be in good company with other
scientists who have been pondering this idea at least as far back as
the 1930's.
As food for thought, I'd like to pose the question: Is it possible
that the notorious "Philadelphia Experiment" utilized these
principles to warp space-time in 1943?
Tilton speaks of possibly "raising" the resonant speed of space --
but what about LOWERING it?
If Einstein was correct in saying that a mass cannot be accelerated
all the way up to light speed, can we perhaps "cheat" by bringing
DOWN the effective speed of light in a given area of space?
It would seen that by manipulating electromagnetics properly we
might be able to alter a region of space and thus be able do perform
all sorts of stange magic tricks.
Any comments relating to these points are welcome!
Page 2
----------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote 1-- S. A. Schelkunoff, "The Impedance Concept and its
Application to Problems of Reflection, Refraction,
Shielding, and Power Absorption", The Bell System
Technical Journal, XVII, no. 1, (January 1938), pp.
17-48.
Footnote 2-- H. B. Tilton, "An Electronic Analog of Relativistic
Space", Electron and Ion Beam Science and Technology
(New York: The Electrochemical Society, Inc., 1968),
pp. 3-14.
---------------------------END OF FILE----------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
Comments
Post a Comment