Project Beta

 --------------------------------------ÔÏ ÓÔÏÐ ÖÉÅ×ÉÎÇ - ÓÔÏÐ ËÅÙ--------------------------------------          ÐROJECT ÂETA- ÐART ÉÉ      

    BY ÐAUL ÂENNEWITZ-------------------------------------- 8) ÁT SOME POINT IN TIME- AGAIN REST-ING UPON BATTLE STATUS, THE DEPLOYMENTOF DE

FENSIVE FORCES WILL BEGIN. ÔHISDEPLOYMENT SHOULD BE DONE IN A NEARINSTANTANEOUS MANNER UNDER CERTAINSPECIAL CONDITIONS THAT CAN BE DISCUSSED

.9) ÔHE WEAPON SYSTEMS SHOULD BE KEPT INTHE POWERED-UP STATE. ÉN THIS MANNER,THE DISKS WILL BE MADE TO STAY AIRBORNE.ÔHEY CANNOT LAND DURING

 THE INTERVALTHAT THE SYSTEM IS POWERED UP.10)×HEN THE WEAPON IS USED IN ONESPECIFI POWER MODE, IN ADDITION TOCONTINUOUS DISCHARGE ON THE DI

SKS THATARE AIRBORNE AND THE GROUND BASEDWEAPONS, THE MIND CONFUSION ANDDISORIENTATION WILL BUILD IN THOSEPERSONNEL AT THE BASE AND UNDERGRO

UND.   ÁT THE END OF FOUR OR FIVE WEEKS ORLESS, ALL OF THEIR WEAPONS SHOULD BETOTALLY DISCHARGED AND THE POWERSHOULD BE OUT ON THE BASES. ÍO

STPERSONNEL, IF FNOT ALL, SHOULD BE TOTALLY INCAPACITATED. ÆEEDINGFORMULA PRODUCTION WILL BE DOWN ANDCRITICAL PROCESSING RUINED. ÁLL EMBRYOS

 SHOULD BE DEAD AND ALL OXYGENAND HYDROGEN CONSUMABLES SHOULD BEDEPLETED. 11) ÂASED UPON DATA GATHERED ON THEPROTOTYPE WEAPONS, THE FULL POW

ERWEAPONS SHOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM HOLDINGOFF THE DISKS. ÉN MANY CASES SOME WILLBREAK WITHIN THE FIRST FORTY-EIGHT HOURSWITHOUT BEING DIRECTLY

 HIT. 12) ÁT THAT POINT, STANDARD WEAPONTECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS CAN COME INTOPLAY AND USED TO THE EXTENT OFDESTRUCTION DESIRED AT THE DIREC

TIONOF THOSE IN CHARGE.13) ÔHE COMMUNICATIONS CAN BE USEDTHROUGHOUT THE CONFLICT TO DETERMINESTATUS AND NEAR THE END TO ATTEMPTTO INSTIGATE 

SURRENDER. ÉF NO RESPONSERESULTS, THEN THEY SHOULD SIMPLY BE CLOSED IN AND WAITED OUT.---------------------------------------        ***** Ó

UMMARY *****--------------------------------------- ÉT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT MY INITIALIMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPUTERCOMMUNICATIONS WAS 

NOT INSTIGATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF TALKING TO ONE OF THEALIENS 'FOR THE FUN OF IT', BUT WASDELIBERATELY INSTIGATED TO USE AS ATOOL TO STUDY, 

IN DEPTH, THE ALIENS ON A LONG TERM BASIS WITHOUT THE NEED FOR PHYSICAL CONFRONTATION, ANDTO DETERMINE POSSIBLE STRENGTHS ANDWEAKNESSES. ÔHE

 WEAPON THEORY AND PROTOTYPES WEREBUILT TO CAPITALIZE UPON AND TEST THETWO ËÅÙ AND PROMINENT WEAKNESSES THATWERE DISCOVERED. ÔHIS IN-HOUSE F

UNDEDPROGRAM HAS BEEN EXPENSIVE, IN EXCESSOF $200,000; ON BEHALF OF OUR NATIONAND HANDLED IN THE BEST REPRESENTATIVEMANNER HUMANLY POSSIBLE.

 (1) ÔHE ÐÒÉÍÅ AND WEAKEST AREA THATWAS DISCOVERED, PROBED AND TESTED ISEXACTLY WHAT THE ALIENS ASSUMED WASTHEIR KEY STRENGTH - THAT BEING T

HEMANIPULATION OF AND CONTROL OF THEMIND. (2) ÔHOUGH THEIR SHIPS SEEM RATHERFORMIDABLE, THEY ALSO HAVE WEAKNESSES,SOLELY BECAUSE OF THEIR ME

THOD ANDUNIQUE MODE OF FLIGHT.-------------------------------------  ÉT IS NOT THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORTTO IMPLY THAT THE OVERALL PROBLEM W

ILLBE SOLVED WITH THE CAPTURE OF THESEBASES. ÏBVIOUSLY IT WILL NOT, BUT ITIS A FIRMLY BASED BEGINNING WITH A HIGH DEGREE OF RATED PROJECTED 

SUCCESS.  ÉT IS NOT INTENDED TO IMPLY THAT THIS PARTICULAR SPECIES OF ALIEN ANDTHEIR HUMANOID WORKERS WILL NOT FIGHT;THEY MAY FIGHT, BUT THE

IR INCLINATIONIS GENERALLY THE OPPOSITE. ÔHIS BASINGAREA IS THE ËÅÙ. ×ITHOUT IT, THEIRMISSION IS IN VERY DEEP TROUBLE. ÉT ISNOTED THAT THESE

 ARE NOT THE ONLY BASES ON EARTH- THERE ARE OTHERS. ×ITH ACONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE USING TYPICALLOGICAL SUPPORT NUMBERS, IT IS NOTUNREALISTIC T

O SAY THAT THERE ARE50,000 ALIENS WITHIN THE ECOSPHERE OFEARTH AND THE SPACE NEAR IT.   ÓOME OF US WILL BE LOST IN THEENDEAVOR. ÔHAT IS OBVI

OUS. ÔHE ËÅÙ TOOVERALL SUCCESS IS THEY THE ALIENSÔÏÔÁÌÌÙ RESPECT ÆÏÒÃÅ. ÁND WITH THEM,THE MOST EFFECTIVE METHOD IS TO STUBBORNLY CONTINUE TO

 PICK AND PULL ATTHEIR DEFENSE WITH ÎÏ LETUP. ÆACED WITHTHE TOTAL LOSS OF BASES THAT IT HASTAKEN ÙÅÁÒÓ TO CONSTRUCT, IT ISBELIEVED THAT THEI

R MISSION ×ÉÌÌ ÂÅGROSSLY WEAKENED AND BADLY SLOWED.   ÁS ÁMERICANS WE MUST REALIZE THATWE CANNOT REPLY UPON OUR INHERENT MORALPRINCIPLES TO 

PROVIDE THE ANSWER.   ÎEGOTIATION IS ÏÕÔ. ÉN FINALCONCLUSION:    [Á] ÎÏ ÎÅÇÏÔÉÁÔÉÏÎ,ÁÇÒÅÅÍÅÎÔ ÏÒ        ÃÏÍÐÒÏÍÉÓÅ.    [Â] ÔÈÅÙ ÁÒÅ ÔÏÔÁÌÌÙ 

ÄÅÃÅÐÔÉÖÅ         ÁÎÄ ÄÅÁÔÈ ÏÒÉÅÎÔÅÄ AND HAVE        ÎÏ ÒÅÓÐÅÃÔ ÆÏÒ ÈÕÍÁÎÓ ÏÒ        ÈÕÍÁÎ ÌÉÆÅ.    [Ã] ÔÈÅÙ ÃÁÎÎÏÔ ÕÎÄÅÒ ÁÎÙ        ÃÉÒÃÕÍÓ

ÔÁÎÃÅÓ ÂÅ ÔÒÕÓÔÅÄ.-------------------------------------   ×Å IN OUR INNOCENT HUMAN WAY,NEGOTIATED THE FIRST TIME BY COMPROMISE-WE TOOK TOO L

ITTLE WITH NO MAJORSAFEGUARDS AND ALLOWED TOO MUCH. ×EMUST ÎÏÔ ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN AGAIN.-------------------------------------             

 ÄR. ÐAUL ÂENNEWITZ