Why read Moby Dick?
Monday, January 23, 2012
I love it--it's
now a book. Why Read Moby-Dick?
Nathaniel
Philbrick is a great writer in his own right. I really enjoyed his
book about the whaleship Essex--it completely captivated me,
and I usually don't like non-fiction at all.
The author of
this article calls the book "a passionate and convincing text."
There is no personal opinion on Moby Dick itself.
But check out
this "argument." If I had a student write this, I would
have the student express why the quote proves the point:
"but when
he quotes Melville, the text soars and Melville’s prose becomes
Philbrick’s best argument for reading the book: 'While gliding
through these latter waters that one serene and moonlight night, when
all the waves rolled by like scrolls of silver; and, by their soft,
suffusing seethings, made what seemed a silvery silence, not a
solitude. ... '"
Yes, I agree,
that sentence is awesome. Should we consider Moby Dick just a
long, great sounding poem then? The term novel just doesn't
fit then anymore, especially if you consider structure.
I love how this
piece ends:
If anyone is
still awaiting the arrival of The Great American Novel(s), give it
up. They have already been written. The first is “The Adventures of
Huckleberry Finn” and the second is “Moby-Dick, or, The Whale.”
I just taught
Huck Finn and didn't have a great experience either. But Huck Finn
has a narrative structure.
Comments
Post a Comment