WACO, THE BIG LIE -- THEY CAN'T EXPLAIN IT AWAY!!!

 

WACO, THE BIG LIE -- THEY CAN'T EXPLAIN IT AWAY!!! (Comments set off

by ******* are my comments and did not appear in the newspaper --

Linda Thompson)

        WASHINGTON TIMES STORY WITH RESPONSE BY LINDA THOMPSON

FBI still probing video of tank at Waco

Washington Times (WT) - Saturday, October  9, 1993

By: Jerry Seper - THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Edition: Final  Section: A  Page: A9

   A  Justice  Department  official  who  helped write a report on

the role of the department  and  the FBI in the Branch Davidian raid

says a video purporting to show a tank shooting flames into the

compound is under review.

   Richard Scruggs, an assistant to Attorney General Janet Reno,

said the video -  by  Indianapolis lawyer Linda Thompson - "raised

our eyebrows and caused the same concern" others have expressed.

    Distributed  to  news  organizations  around the country, the

video purports to show  one of the FBI tanks at the Waco compound

firing flames into the building before the start of the fire.

   Miss Thompson has claimed it proves the FBI started the blaze

that killed 85 persons, including 24 children. Mr.  Scruggs  said

that  Justice  officials  submitted  the  video  to  the University

of  Maryland  for expert analysis and that preliminary results have

not been conclusive.

*******************************************************************

Comment: Every expert to whom I have shown this tape or with whom I

have discussed it has said that the original footage, or footage

better than a VHS copy must be examined.  I have this footage and NO

ONE from the Department of Justice or University of Maryland has

asked to examine it.  Their so-called "examination" is yet another

FRAUD!! --Linda Thompson

******************************************************************

   He  said  that the armored vehicle used by federal authorities,

on loan from the  military,  was not equipped with any type of

flame-throwing capability and that  the only way a flame could have

come from it would have been through some type of "busted hydraulic

line or something like that."

   He  said Justice officials had examined the vehicle and found no

evidence of broken parts.  Another analysis of the tape has been

ordered, he said.

******************************************************************

Comment: They are "examining" the wrong vehicle, or lying.  In the

official reports, Reno and Dennis claimed the tank in my footage is

merely a CEV. That is false.  It was disguised to LOOK like a CEV,

but it is not. And they have been examining a CEV, which is why they

aren't finding the evidence -- FBI, WHERE'S THE M67 FLAME THROWING

TANK? --Linda Thompson

*****************************************************************

   Mr.  Scruggs  noted  that a preliminary assessment of the video

is that what appears  to  be  a  flame  shooting  out  of  the

vehicle was a flash from the dispersant  -  carbon monoxixde - used

to propel the chemical agent CS into the compound.

*****************************************************************

COMMENT: IMPORTANT!!  NOTICE THE DOJ IS NOW CLAIMING THAT CARBON

MONOXIDE, A DEADLY POISONOUS GAS, WAS USED TO "PROPEL THE CHEMICAL

AGENT CS" (CS GAS) INTO THE HOUSE!!!  Remember how they claimed to

have used a "non-flammable" CS gas that wouldn't hurt the children?

How many different lies is this about the gas now?

Worse, the inventory filed with the court by the police PLAINLY

shows that the CS gas was shot in with GRENADE LAUNCHERS, using

FERRET GRENADES.  None of the tanks were equipped to "inject gas"

that were out at Mt. Carmel, which is plainly visible in all the

footage available from April 19.

******************************************************************

   A second possibility, he said, was a defect in the way the video

was shot.

****************************************************************

Comment: Fine.  Let them make that claim for the OTHER TWO segments

of video tape now known to exist that ALSO show a flame throwing

tank at DIFFERENT PARTS of the house!  Explain why an M67

FLAME-THROWING TANK is PLAINLY VISIBLE pushing the house into the

fire, and parked alongside the ruins in the tape, Waco, the Big Lie,

too. --LT

****************************************************************

   "I don't know what it is," he said.  "I'll have to be honest with

you."

****************************************************************

Comment: "Honest?" Ha!  That's a laugh.  He knows darned good and

well what it is.  His problem is trying to find a lie the public

will buy! --LT

***************************************************************

    He noted  that the fire at the compound did not erupt for at

least 35 to 40 minutes after the light flash is observed in the

video.

***************************************************************

Comment: This damns them, right here!  Either this is an outright

lie or they have possession of footage from a TV station.  There is

no way to make any "time" determination from my tape because my tape

doesn't show the rest of the footage after the tank backs out up to

the point the fire is seen at the window.  That particular tank and

other tanks went in and out of the same hole at least nine times.

Furthermore, overhead shots of the fire show that the fire DID begin

at that back wall at the same time as the window fire is visible.

And it wasn't any 35-40 minutes earlier, either.

***************************************************************

   An inquiry into the video was continuing, Mr.  Scruggs said.

*************************************************************

Comment:

That's the understatement of the year -- thousands of Americans are

now investigating this because we KNOW the feds have lied through

their teeth and we're SICK of it.

To get a copy of Waco, the Big Lie:

Visa/MC: 1-800-758-0308.

Check, money order, etc:

Waco, PO Box 14, Beech Grove, IN 46107

$19.95 + 3.00 s/h.

 # Origin: Rifle Range 914-452-4753 Firearms Liberty Politics (1:272/68)