Children's Writers Chat 11-14-00 Guest: Patty Campbell, reviewer/feature writer of YAs
Subject: Childrens Writers Chat-PCampbell
Author: writerbabe
Uploaded By: JOANWRITE
Date: 11/28/2000
File: CWC 11-14-00.log (15394 bytes)
Estimated Download Time (17541 baud): < 1 minute
Download Count: 13
Equipment: whatever got you here
Needs: whatever can read a text file
Children's Writers Chat 11-14-00
Guest: Patty Campbell, reviewer/feature writer of YAs
Tuesdays
9 p.m. ET (6 p.m. PT), Writers Workshop
Children's Writers chat - writers and illustrators of children's books meet for specific topics and special guest speakers, moderated by HOST WRTR WBABE & HOST WRTR CGaley, with HOST WRTR sUe & HOST WRTR Neely (Greeters).
****disinfected using Disinfectant 3.7.1****
<HTML>Children's Writers Chat 11-14-00<BR>
Guest: Patty Campbell, reviewer/feature writer of YAs<BR>
<BR>
WriterBabe: We're going into protocol now.<BR>
WriterBabe: That means when it's time for audience participation, type ? for<BR>
a question,<BR>
WriterBabe: ! for a comment, and wait your turn in the queue to be called<BR>
on.<BR>
WriterBabe: Type GA for Go Ahead (guests, too) when you've finished<BR>
speaking.<BR>
WriterBabe: My co-host Chuck Galey may butt in at will.<BR>
CGaley: (Hi!)<BR>
WriterBabe: Wave, Chuck!<BR>
CGaley: (waving!)<BR>
WriterBabe: Tonight I'm so pleased to welcome a critic, writer, librarian,<BR>
brainiac I greatly admire:<BR>
WriterBabe: Patty Campbell, who writes a regular feature on YA books in THE<BR>
HORN BOOK.<BR>
WriterBabe: Welcome, Patty!<BR>
Shorecam: Nice to be here with you all.<BR>
WriterBabe: Would you like to make any opening remarks, or shall I hit you<BR>
with questions?<BR>
Shorecam: Shoot at will.<BR>
WriterBabe: Okay, first of all, please give us your definition of a YA book.<BR>
WriterBabe: What are the divisions in the genre?<BR>
WriterBabe: GA<BR>
Shorecam: Wow! Nothing like starting with a hard one! "What is a YA book" is<BR>
a question that us YA <BR>
WriterBabe: (That's my forte--dumbfounding the guest!)<BR>
Shorecam: aficionados argue about all the time. I guess I'd say that a YA<BR>
book, or novel, if we're tal<BR>
Shorecam: king about fiction here, is a novel told from the point of<BR>
view--AND WITH THE LIMITATIONS OF<BR>
Shorecam: PERCEPTION-- of a person between 12 and 17. GA<BR>
CGaley: (Nice description!)<BR>
WriterBabe: Ooh, I like that--with the limitations of perception!<BR>
WriterBabe: Makes a big difference.<BR>
WriterBabe: I'm interested in your quote, "A paradox that emerged was the<BR>
tendency of some librarians <BR>
Shorecam: Yes. A coming-of-age novel told from an adult remembrance isn't a<BR>
YA novel. GA <BR>
WriterBabe: and teachers to reject 'dark' or 'cutting edge' books...as 'too<BR>
adult' in content and theme,<BR>
WriterBabe: yet welcome adult books for YAs with open arms."<BR>
WriterBabe: How has that attitude changed, if at all?<BR>
WriterBabe: What's your take on that infamous word "edgy"? GA<BR>
Shorecam: Well, "edgy" is certainly better than "bleak," which is what a lot<BR>
of uninformed reporters<BR>
Shorecam: laid on YA lit last year. "Edgy" means real, risky, honest.GA<BR>
Mach2 2: lynwritebk<BR>
WriterBabe: Has the attitude toward these books changed, Patty? GA<BR>
Shorecam: Whose attitude? Librarians, teachers, parents, the general public?<BR>
Kids have always loved <BR>
Shorecam: dark stuff. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Librarians and teachers, as per your quote. GA<BR>
Shorecam: Yes, as kids' world is riskier, they need books that reflect that<BR>
reality, and perceptive <BR>
Shorecam: youth advocates and publishers, too, recognize that. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Thanks.<BR>
WriterBabe: Because of new electronic media, kids process information<BR>
differently, yes?<BR>
WriterBabe: How has that resulted in new book forms and styles? GA<BR>
Shorecam: Interesting question. Yes, there is this theory which has been put<BR>
forth by Eliza Dresang in<BR>
Shorecam: a book titled Radical Change. Eliza says that people, and<BR>
especially kids, have had changes <BR>
Shorecam: in the way the brain processes information because of exposure to<BR>
electronic media. Instead <BR>
Shorecam: of taking in information in a linear way, from A to Z, we gather<BR>
it in bits here and there <BR>
Shorecam: and put it together in our heads, interacting with it and each<BR>
other. So YA novels like <BR>
Shorecam: Monster are starting to reflect that.<BR>
Shorecam: GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Please tell us who Eliza Dresang is, Patty. GA<BR>
Shorecam: Oh, shoot. She's an academic, but I have to admit I don't remember<BR>
where. Blush.GA<BR>
WriterBabe: For those folks who haven't read MONSTER, it's written in the<BR>
form of a screenplay and also <BR>
WriterBabe: uses a variety of graphics.<BR>
WriterBabe: Do you want to add anything about MONSTER, Patty? GA<BR>
Shorecam: Yes, It also has passages which are Steve's thoughts about the<BR>
crime and the prison and the <BR>
Shorecam: trial. These appear in cursive on grey paper, while the screen<BR>
play<BR>
Shorecam: appears in print on white paper and the two are mixed together.<BR>
There are bits and hints of<BR>
Shorecam: the story, but you can put together at least 6 or 7 versions, all<BR>
contradictory GA<BR>
WriterBabe: We should add that it was written by Walter Dean Myers, a<BR>
fabulous writer.<BR>
Shorecam: And that it won the Printz Prize last year GA<BR>
WriterBabe: For my mailing about this chat, I quoted you.<BR>
WriterBabe: Since you made some of those remarks, a number of things have<BR>
changed in the book biz.<BR>
WriterBabe: Let's talk about some of those changes.<BR>
WriterBabe: For instance, what are the new forms of multiculturalism? GA<BR>
Shorecam: The way diversity appears in YA novels lately reflects the way it<BR>
is changing in our society<BR>
Shorecam: We're getting stories where the characters are of many different<BR>
ethnic and racial backgroun<BR>
Shorecam: ds, or characters that have diverse racial identities. The<BR>
relevant thing for writers is <BR>
Shorecam: that you no longer have to "be it to write it" with this new<BR>
perspective GA<BR>
WriterBabe: How are publishers responding to these manuscripts? GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Meaning, are they actively seeking them? GA<BR>
Shorecam: There have been a lot of these <BR>
Shorecam: (I'm struggling to know what to call them)<BR>
Shorecam: lately by writers who are not necessarily "multicultural." GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Interesting.<BR>
WriterBabe: Let's talk about religion. How is religion as taboo in YA's<BR>
changing?<BR>
WriterBabe: What changes would you still like to see? GA<BR>
Shorecam: Well, first I have to say that your short story collection, I<BR>
Believe in Water, is a prime <BR>
Shorecam: example of what I would like to see. That is, QUESTIONS of faith<BR>
raised from many <BR>
Shorecam: different perspectives, so kids can wrestle out their own<BR>
spiritual paths.GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Thanks, Patty. I love guests who plug my books. LOL<BR>
KellyMilnerH: (I BELIEVE IN WATER, the collection from HarperCollins EDITED<BR>
by WriterBabe.)<BR>
WriterBabe: Thanks, Kelly.<BR>
WriterBabe: So, Patty, you feel that things have changed re: religion? GA<BR>
Shorecam: Nope. I haven't seen any novels this year that touch on the<BR>
subject. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Oh, dear.<BR>
WriterBabe: Still a taboo, then.<BR>
WriterBabe: GA<BR>
WriterBabe: A few more questions from me, and then let's open this to the<BR>
audience.<BR>
Shorecam: Maybe. But I do hear a lot of buzz among publishers, willingness<BR>
to acknowledge the need.<BR>
Shorecam: But it's very hard to find writers who are theologically literate,<BR>
and when this kind of thi<BR>
Shorecam: thing is bad, it's awful. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: You are a reviewer. Please tell us how books get reviewed. How<BR>
do they nominated for <BR>
WriterBabe: prizes, honor lists, awards? GA<BR>
Shorecam: Books get reviewed when their publishers send a copy to the review<BR>
journal. Same answer for<BR>
Shorecam: prizes, honor lists, etc. I can't review what I don't have in<BR>
hand, and honor committees <BR>
Shorecam: can't consider something they haven't seen. So writers need<BR>
Shorecam: to make very sure that the publisher is sending out those copies.<BR>
Now, how does a reviewer <BR>
Shorecam: choose which books to review--that's another question. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: But even when publishers send out the books, they don't all get<BR>
reviewed. That's been my <BR>
WriterBabe: experience.<BR>
WriterBabe: So, how DOES a reviewer choose which books to review?<BR>
Shorecam: Well, I have to tell you that my office where I am right now is<BR>
stacked with piles o' books <BR>
Shorecam: everywhere, and that's only the 2000 season. And I only do four<BR>
books a month for Amazon. So<BR>
Shorecam: I have to be highly selective. Mostly I choose what seems to me to<BR>
be <BR>
Shorecam: important, and let's face it, books I want to read. And of course,<BR>
authors I love. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Last question from me, then it's time for audience<BR>
participation. So, folks, start typing ?<BR>
WriterBabe: and !<BR>
KellyMilnerH: ?<BR>
WriterBabe: You've said that you think the National Book Awards nominations<BR>
are peculiar this year.<BR>
WriterBabe: Why? GA<BR>
Shorecam: Aargh! Peculiar is right. In a year when we had fabulous books<BR>
like Dreamland, Gold Dust, <BR>
Shorecam: The Beet Fields, they chose three YA novels, one adult book, and<BR>
one who knows what. All of <BR>
Shorecam: them are very obscure except Book of the Lion, which really might<BR>
deserve the honor. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Thanks, Patty. <BR>
WriterBabe: Now it's time for the audience to have its say.<BR>
WriterBabe: Kelly, you're first.<BR>
WriterBabe: (Type ? and !, folks)<BR>
KellyMilnerH: Sorry I jumped the gun. Two questions, actually. What makes a<BR>
writer "theologically" <BR>
KellyMilnerH: qualified? And how did you come to review for Amazon? GA<BR>
PHeeren: ?<BR>
Shorecam: Challenging question, Kelly. To me, "theologically literate" means<BR>
a writer who has an under<BR>
Shorecam: standing and some background on ---well--theology, in a broader<BR>
sense than one's own persona<BR>
Shorecam: lbelief structure. In other words, somebody who's put some effort<BR>
into studying this subject<BR>
Shorecam: Second question: Amazon asked me to be one of their two YA<BR>
reviewers, I guess, on the basis <BR>
Shorecam: of my twenty-six years of writing about YA books and being willing<BR>
to stick my neck out with<BR>
Shorecam: opinions. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: PH, your turn.<BR>
PHeeren: Did young adult fiction start out in the late 1960s, after the<BR>
changes of the counterculture<BR>
Shorecam: Waiting<BR>
PHeeren: of the late 60s or very early? I am confused since I have two<BR>
nieces, both teenagers<BR>
WriterBabe: (Queue's empty, folks. Type ? and !)<BR>
BOEDEN: ~ © ~ © ~ 15 MINUTE WARNING ~ © ~ © ~<BR>
PHeeren: ga<BR>
Chrizmoore: ?<BR>
BOEDEN: Lost Marilyn<BR>
CGaley: WOAH! Marilyn got bumped!<BR>
Shorecam: YA fiction as we know it began in 1967, with the publication of<BR>
The Outsiders. Before that <BR>
Shorecam: there was something called the "junior novel" that was mostly<BR>
about pimples and the junior<BR>
CGaley: (Ummm... Chrizmoore, you're next)<BR>
Shorecam: prom, and was not serious literature. I don't think the<BR>
counterculture<BR>
CGaley: (When I call on you)<BR>
Shorecam: had much to do with it though. (She says reluctantly) GA<BR>
PHeeren: oh, thanks for the history, shore<BR>
CGaley: Ok,Chriz... you're up... ga<BR>
Chrizmoore: Patty, are you familiar with Armageddon Summer by Jane Yolen &<BR>
Bruce Coville? If so, how <BR>
Chrizmoore: does that fit into your hopes for religion taboos in YA? GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Whew! Sorry about that. Computer crashed.<BR>
Shorecam: A worthy effort. Yolen and Coville resisted the temptation to<BR>
demonize the minister, and the<BR>
Shorecam: two characters didn't accept the spiritual positions of their<BR>
parents, but worked out their <BR>
Shorecam: own salvation with fear and trembling. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: (Queue's empty, folks)<BR>
Chrizmoore: They did a great job of thinking and writing comapssionately and<BR>
openly. Thanks Patty!<BR>
KellyMilnerH: ?<BR>
WriterBabe: Kelly, go ahead.<BR>
KellyMilnerH: Patty, there was a big discussion about GIVE A BOY A GUN on<BR>
the YALSA list.<BR>
KellyMilnerH: Did you agree that politics held this book about school<BR>
shootings back? GA<BR>
KellyMilnerH: (by Todd Strasser, BTW)<BR>
Shorecam: Held it back from what? GA<BR>
KellyMilnerH: Wider sales, more reviews, etc.<BR>
KellyMilnerH: GA<BR>
BOEDEN: ©¿©¬ ~~~ 10 MINUTE WARNING ~~~ ©¿©¬<BR>
LYPHIS: ?<BR>
Shorecam: As far as I know it's doing just fine. I think the real problem<BR>
with the book is that it's<BR>
Shorecam: not very well written. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Patty doesn't mince words!<BR>
WriterBabe: Phyllis, you're next. <BR>
LYPHIS: May I ask you to talk about the book “Cruddy.”<BR>
Shorecam: haven't seen it. Tell me more. GA<BR>
LYPHIS: Oh dear<BR>
LYPHIS: Forget the author<BR>
LYPHIS: My bookstore said there was a big stir by young people about it<BR>
MaryP2000: ?<BR>
LYPHIS: over a yr ago<BR>
LYPHIS: It was by an author, columnist, humorist<BR>
Shorecam: Interesting. I'll track it down. Are you sure it's YA? I'm really<BR>
ignorant about children's <BR>
Shorecam: books. GA<BR>
LYPHIS: I hadn't realized that and took it seriously<BR>
LYPHIS: yes, ya<BR>
LYPHIS: 16 yr old mc<BR>
LYPHIS: about a teen feeling, having lived a 'cruddy' life<BR>
WriterBabe: It's by Lynda Barry, according to Amazon.<BR>
LYPHIS: and who goes on to write about her coming suicide<BR>
LYPHIS: which she doesn't do, at the end...<BR>
KellyMilnerH: ?<BR>
Shorecam: Oh, of course. Lynda Barry. I think she's brilliant, but<BR>
definitely adult material for older<BR>
Shorecam: teens only. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Mary, you're next.<BR>
MaryP2000: Patti, you said you had to be selective in choosing books to<BR>
review. Do you feel you are <BR>
BOEDEN: ~ º ~ º ~ 5 MINUTE WARNING ~ º ~ º ~ <BR>
MaryP2000: influenced by the covers in making that decision when you are<BR>
facing those huge stacks?<BR>
Shorecam: Sure. GA<BR>
MaryP2000: GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Patty, care to elaborate? GA<BR>
MaryP2000: So it is only "favorite authors, publishers, etc.?<BR>
Shorecam: I'm not sure I can. Just an intriguing, gorgeous cover draws you<BR>
in. GA<BR>
Jgregers: ?<BR>
WriterBabe: Okay. Kelly, your turn.<BR>
KellyMilnerH: Who do you see as writers who should be read by WOULD-BE YA<BR>
authors? GA<BR>
Shorecam: No, of course not. Fresh, new writers definitely draw my interest.<BR>
GA<BR>
KellyMilnerH: NO, I'm asking what authors you consider the best of the best,<BR>
instructional for new writers<BR>
Shorecam: Start with Cormier, then go on to Cynthia Voigt, Chris Crutcher,<BR>
Walter Dean Myers, Norma <BR>
Julisari: ?<BR>
Shorecam: Fox Mazer, I could go on for hours. And responding to that thing<BR>
about <BR>
Shorecam: reviews, remember that VOYA magazine has an its goal to review<BR>
BOEDEN: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~Sorry, TIME IS UP FOR TONIGHT. <BR>
Shorecam: everyting YA, and Librarians buy from VOYA. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Patty, any closing remarks?<BR>
WriterBabe: GA<BR>
Shorecam: You guys ask tough questions. But it's been fun. GA<BR>
WriterBabe: Thank you so much for being a great guest!<BR>
WriterBabe: Yeah, we're the toughies!<BR>
PHeeren: great chat, writer and boeden<BR>
WriterBabe: LOL<BR>
CGaley: Thanks Patty!<BR>
KellyMilnerH: Thanks Patty, fascinating stuff.<BR>
Julisari: Thank you, Patty!!!<BR>
</HTML>
Comments
Post a Comment