Children's Writers Chat 11-14-00 Guest: Patty Campbell, reviewer/feature writer of YAs

 Subject:  Childrens Writers Chat-PCampbell

Author:  writerbabe

Uploaded By:  JOANWRITE

Date:  11/28/2000


File:  CWC 11-14-00.log (15394 bytes) 

Estimated Download Time (17541 baud):  < 1 minute

Download Count:  13


Equipment:  whatever got you here

Needs:  whatever can read a text file



Children's Writers Chat 11-14-00


Guest: Patty Campbell, reviewer/feature writer of YAs



Tuesdays 

9 p.m. ET (6 p.m. PT), Writers Workshop

Children's Writers chat - writers and illustrators of children's books meet for specific topics and special guest speakers, moderated by HOST WRTR WBABE & HOST WRTR CGaley, with HOST WRTR sUe & HOST WRTR Neely (Greeters).


****disinfected using Disinfectant 3.7.1****

<HTML>Children's Writers Chat 11-14-00<BR>

Guest: Patty Campbell, reviewer/feature writer of YAs<BR>

<BR>

WriterBabe: We're going into protocol now.<BR>

WriterBabe: That means when it's time for audience participation, type ? for<BR>

a question,<BR>

WriterBabe: ! for a comment, and wait your turn in the queue to be called<BR>

on.<BR>

WriterBabe: Type GA for Go Ahead (guests, too) when you've finished<BR>

speaking.<BR>

WriterBabe: My co-host Chuck Galey may butt in at will.<BR>

CGaley: (Hi!)<BR>

WriterBabe: Wave, Chuck!<BR>

CGaley: (waving!)<BR>

WriterBabe: Tonight I'm so pleased to welcome a critic, writer, librarian,<BR>

brainiac I greatly admire:<BR>

WriterBabe: Patty Campbell, who writes a regular feature on YA books in THE<BR>

HORN BOOK.<BR>

WriterBabe: Welcome, Patty!<BR>

Shorecam: Nice to be here with you all.<BR>

WriterBabe: Would you like to make any opening remarks, or shall I hit you<BR>

with questions?<BR>

Shorecam: Shoot at will.<BR>

WriterBabe: Okay, first of all, please give us your definition of a YA book.<BR>

WriterBabe: What are the divisions in the genre?<BR>

WriterBabe: GA<BR>

Shorecam: Wow! Nothing like starting with a hard one! "What is a YA book" is<BR>

a question that us YA <BR>

WriterBabe: (That's my forte--dumbfounding the guest!)<BR>

Shorecam: aficionados argue about all the time. I guess I'd say that a YA<BR>

book, or novel, if we're tal<BR>

Shorecam: king about fiction here, is a novel told from the point of<BR>

view--AND WITH THE LIMITATIONS OF<BR>

Shorecam: PERCEPTION-- of a person between 12 and 17. GA<BR>

CGaley: (Nice description!)<BR>

WriterBabe: Ooh, I like that--with the limitations of perception!<BR>

WriterBabe: Makes a big difference.<BR>

WriterBabe: I'm interested in your quote, "A paradox that emerged was the<BR>

tendency of some librarians <BR>

Shorecam: Yes. A coming-of-age novel told from an adult remembrance isn't a<BR>

YA novel. GA <BR>

WriterBabe: and teachers to reject 'dark' or 'cutting edge' books...as 'too<BR>

adult' in content and theme,<BR>

WriterBabe: yet welcome adult books for YAs with open arms."<BR>

WriterBabe: How has that attitude changed, if at all?<BR>

WriterBabe: What's your take on that infamous word "edgy"?  GA<BR>

Shorecam: Well, "edgy" is certainly better than "bleak," which is what a lot<BR>

of uninformed reporters<BR>

Shorecam: laid on YA lit last year. "Edgy" means real, risky, honest.GA<BR>

Mach2 2: lynwritebk<BR>

WriterBabe: Has the attitude toward these books changed, Patty?  GA<BR>

Shorecam: Whose attitude? Librarians, teachers, parents, the general public?<BR>

Kids have always loved <BR>

Shorecam: dark stuff. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Librarians and teachers, as per your quote.  GA<BR>

Shorecam: Yes, as kids' world is riskier, they need books that reflect that<BR>

reality, and perceptive <BR>

Shorecam: youth advocates and publishers, too, recognize that. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Thanks.<BR>

WriterBabe: Because of new electronic media, kids process information<BR>

differently, yes?<BR>

WriterBabe: How has that resulted in new book forms and styles?  GA<BR>

Shorecam: Interesting question. Yes, there is this theory which has been put<BR>

forth by Eliza Dresang in<BR>

Shorecam: a book titled Radical Change. Eliza says that people, and<BR>

especially kids, have had changes <BR>

Shorecam: in the way the brain processes information because of exposure to<BR>

electronic media. Instead <BR>

Shorecam: of taking in information in a linear way, from A to Z, we gather<BR>

it in bits here and there <BR>

Shorecam: and put it together in our heads, interacting with it and each<BR>

other. So YA novels like <BR>

Shorecam: Monster are starting to reflect that.<BR>

Shorecam: GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Please tell us who Eliza Dresang is, Patty.  GA<BR>

Shorecam: Oh, shoot. She's an academic, but I have to admit I don't remember<BR>

where. Blush.GA<BR>

WriterBabe: For those folks who haven't read MONSTER, it's written in the<BR>

form of a screenplay and also <BR>

WriterBabe: uses a variety of graphics.<BR>

WriterBabe: Do you want to add anything about MONSTER, Patty?  GA<BR>

Shorecam: Yes, It also has passages which are Steve's thoughts about the<BR>

crime and the prison and the <BR>

Shorecam: trial. These appear in cursive on grey paper, while the screen<BR>

play<BR>

Shorecam: appears in print on white paper and the two are mixed together.<BR>

There are bits and hints of<BR>

Shorecam: the story, but you can put together at least 6 or 7 versions, all<BR>

contradictory GA<BR>

WriterBabe: We should add that it was written by Walter Dean Myers, a<BR>

fabulous writer.<BR>

Shorecam: And that it won the Printz Prize last year GA<BR>

WriterBabe: For my mailing about this chat, I quoted you.<BR>

WriterBabe: Since you made some of those remarks, a number of things have<BR>

changed in the book biz.<BR>

WriterBabe: Let's talk about some of those changes.<BR>

WriterBabe: For instance, what are the new forms of multiculturalism?  GA<BR>

Shorecam: The way diversity appears in YA novels lately reflects the way it<BR>

is changing in our society<BR>

Shorecam: We're getting stories where the characters are of many different<BR>

ethnic and racial backgroun<BR>

Shorecam: ds, or characters that have diverse racial identities. The<BR>

relevant thing for writers is  <BR>

Shorecam: that you no longer have to "be it to write it" with this new<BR>

perspective GA<BR>

WriterBabe: How are publishers responding to these manuscripts?  GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Meaning, are they actively seeking them?  GA<BR>

Shorecam: There have been a lot of these <BR>

Shorecam: (I'm struggling to know what to call them)<BR>

Shorecam: lately by writers who are not necessarily "multicultural." GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Interesting.<BR>

WriterBabe: Let's talk about religion.  How is religion as taboo in YA's<BR>

changing?<BR>

WriterBabe: What changes would you still like to see?  GA<BR>

Shorecam: Well, first I have to say that your short story collection, I<BR>

Believe in Water, is a prime  <BR>

Shorecam: example of what I would like to see. That is, QUESTIONS of faith<BR>

raised from many <BR>

Shorecam: different perspectives, so kids can wrestle out their own<BR>

spiritual paths.GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Thanks, Patty.  I love guests who plug my books.  LOL<BR>

KellyMilnerH: (I BELIEVE IN WATER, the collection from HarperCollins EDITED<BR>

by WriterBabe.)<BR>

WriterBabe: Thanks, Kelly.<BR>

WriterBabe: So, Patty, you feel that things have changed re:  religion?  GA<BR>

Shorecam: Nope. I haven't seen any novels this year that touch on the<BR>

subject. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Oh, dear.<BR>

WriterBabe: Still a taboo, then.<BR>

WriterBabe: GA<BR>

WriterBabe: A few more questions from me, and then let's open this to the<BR>

audience.<BR>

Shorecam: Maybe. But I do hear a lot of buzz among publishers, willingness<BR>

to acknowledge the need.<BR>

Shorecam: But it's very hard to find writers who are theologically literate,<BR>

and when this kind of thi<BR>

Shorecam: thing is bad, it's awful. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: You are a reviewer.  Please tell us how books get reviewed.  How<BR>

do they nominated for <BR>

WriterBabe: prizes, honor lists, awards?  GA<BR>

Shorecam: Books get reviewed when their publishers send a copy to the review<BR>

journal. Same answer for<BR>

Shorecam: prizes, honor lists, etc. I can't review what I don't have in<BR>

hand, and honor committees <BR>

Shorecam: can't consider something they haven't seen. So writers need<BR>

Shorecam: to make very sure that the publisher is sending out those copies.<BR>

Now, how does a reviewer <BR>

Shorecam: choose which books to review--that's another question. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: But even when publishers send out the books, they don't all get<BR>

reviewed.  That's been my <BR>

WriterBabe: experience.<BR>

WriterBabe: So, how DOES a reviewer choose which books to review?<BR>

Shorecam: Well, I have to tell you that my office where I am right now is<BR>

stacked with piles o' books <BR>

Shorecam: everywhere, and that's only the 2000 season. And I only do four<BR>

books a month for Amazon. So<BR>

Shorecam: I have to be highly selective. Mostly I choose what seems to me to<BR>

be <BR>

Shorecam: important, and let's face it, books I want to read. And of course,<BR>

authors I love. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Last question from me, then it's time for audience<BR>

participation.  So, folks, start typing ?<BR>

WriterBabe: and !<BR>

KellyMilnerH: ?<BR>

WriterBabe: You've said that you think the National Book Awards nominations<BR>

are peculiar this year.<BR>

WriterBabe: Why?  GA<BR>

Shorecam: Aargh!  Peculiar is right. In a year when we had fabulous books<BR>

like Dreamland, Gold Dust, <BR>

Shorecam: The Beet Fields, they chose three YA novels, one adult book, and<BR>

one who knows what. All of <BR>

Shorecam: them are very obscure except Book of the Lion, which really might<BR>

deserve the honor. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Thanks, Patty.  <BR>

WriterBabe: Now it's time for the audience to have its say.<BR>

WriterBabe: Kelly, you're first.<BR>

WriterBabe: (Type ? and !, folks)<BR>

KellyMilnerH: Sorry I jumped the gun. Two questions, actually.  What makes a<BR>

writer "theologically" <BR>

KellyMilnerH: qualified?  And how did you come to review for Amazon?  GA<BR>

PHeeren: ?<BR>

Shorecam: Challenging question, Kelly. To me, "theologically literate" means<BR>

a writer who has an under<BR>

Shorecam: standing and some background on ---well--theology, in a broader<BR>

sense than one's own persona<BR>

Shorecam: lbelief structure. In other words, somebody who's put some effort<BR>

into studying this subject<BR>

Shorecam: Second question: Amazon asked me to be one of their two YA<BR>

reviewers, I guess, on the basis <BR>

Shorecam: of my twenty-six years of writing about YA books and being willing<BR>

to stick my neck out with<BR>

Shorecam: opinions. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: PH, your turn.<BR>

PHeeren: Did young adult fiction start out in the late 1960s, after the<BR>

changes of the counterculture<BR>

Shorecam: Waiting<BR>

PHeeren: of the late 60s or very early? I am confused since I have two<BR>

nieces, both teenagers<BR>

WriterBabe: (Queue's empty, folks.  Type ? and !)<BR>

BOEDEN: ~ © ~ © ~ 15 MINUTE WARNING ~ © ~ © ~<BR>

PHeeren: ga<BR>

Chrizmoore: ?<BR>

BOEDEN: Lost Marilyn<BR>

CGaley: WOAH!  Marilyn got bumped!<BR>

Shorecam: YA fiction as we know it began in 1967, with the publication of<BR>

The Outsiders. Before that <BR>

Shorecam: there was something called the "junior novel" that was mostly<BR>

about pimples and the junior<BR>

CGaley: (Ummm... Chrizmoore, you're next)<BR>

Shorecam: prom, and was not serious literature. I don't think the<BR>

counterculture<BR>

CGaley: (When I call on you)<BR>

Shorecam: had much to do with it though. (She says reluctantly) GA<BR>

PHeeren: oh, thanks for the history, shore<BR>

CGaley: Ok,Chriz... you're up... ga<BR>

Chrizmoore: Patty, are you familiar with Armageddon Summer by Jane Yolen &<BR>

Bruce Coville?  If so, how <BR>

Chrizmoore: does that fit into your hopes for religion taboos in YA?  GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Whew!  Sorry about that.  Computer crashed.<BR>

Shorecam: A worthy effort. Yolen and Coville resisted the temptation to<BR>

demonize the minister, and the<BR>

Shorecam: two characters didn't accept the spiritual positions of their<BR>

parents, but worked out their <BR>

Shorecam: own salvation with fear and trembling. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: (Queue's empty, folks)<BR>

Chrizmoore: They did a great job of thinking and writing comapssionately and<BR>

openly.  Thanks Patty!<BR>

KellyMilnerH: ?<BR>

WriterBabe: Kelly, go ahead.<BR>

KellyMilnerH: Patty, there was a big discussion about GIVE A BOY A GUN on<BR>

the YALSA list.<BR>

KellyMilnerH: Did you agree that politics held this book about school<BR>

shootings back?  GA<BR>

KellyMilnerH: (by Todd Strasser, BTW)<BR>

Shorecam: Held it back from what? GA<BR>

KellyMilnerH: Wider sales, more reviews, etc.<BR>

KellyMilnerH: GA<BR>

BOEDEN: ©¿©¬ ~~~ 10 MINUTE WARNING ~~~ ©¿©¬<BR>

LYPHIS: ?<BR>

Shorecam: As   far as I know it's doing just fine. I think the real problem<BR>

with the book is that it's<BR>

Shorecam: not very well written. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Patty doesn't mince words!<BR>

WriterBabe: Phyllis, you're next.  <BR>

LYPHIS: May I ask  you to talk about  the book “Cruddy.”<BR>

Shorecam: haven't seen it. Tell me more. GA<BR>

LYPHIS: Oh dear<BR>

LYPHIS: Forget the author<BR>

LYPHIS: My bookstore said there was a big stir by young people about it<BR>

MaryP2000: ?<BR>

LYPHIS: over a yr ago<BR>

LYPHIS: It was by an author, columnist, humorist<BR>

Shorecam: Interesting. I'll track it down. Are you sure it's YA? I'm really<BR>

ignorant about children's <BR>

Shorecam: books. GA<BR>

LYPHIS: I hadn't realized that and took it seriously<BR>

LYPHIS: yes, ya<BR>

LYPHIS: 16 yr old mc<BR>

LYPHIS: about a teen feeling, having lived a 'cruddy' life<BR>

WriterBabe: It's by Lynda Barry, according to Amazon.<BR>

LYPHIS: and who goes on to write about her coming suicide<BR>

LYPHIS: which she doesn't do, at the end...<BR>

KellyMilnerH: ?<BR>

Shorecam: Oh, of course. Lynda Barry. I think she's brilliant, but<BR>

definitely adult material for older<BR>

Shorecam: teens only. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Mary, you're next.<BR>

MaryP2000: Patti, you said you had to be selective in choosing books to<BR>

review.  Do you feel you are <BR>

BOEDEN: ~ º ~ º ~ 5 MINUTE WARNING ~ º ~ º ~ <BR>

MaryP2000: influenced by the covers in making that decision when you are<BR>

facing those huge stacks?<BR>

Shorecam: Sure. GA<BR>

MaryP2000: GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Patty, care to elaborate?  GA<BR>

MaryP2000: So it is only "favorite authors, publishers, etc.?<BR>

Shorecam: I'm not sure I can. Just an intriguing, gorgeous cover draws you<BR>

in. GA<BR>

Jgregers: ?<BR>

WriterBabe: Okay.  Kelly, your turn.<BR>

KellyMilnerH: Who do you see as writers who should be read by WOULD-BE YA<BR>

authors?  GA<BR>

Shorecam: No, of course not. Fresh, new writers definitely draw my interest.<BR>

GA<BR>

KellyMilnerH: NO, I'm asking what authors you consider the best of the best,<BR>

instructional for new writers<BR>

Shorecam: Start with Cormier, then go on to Cynthia Voigt, Chris Crutcher,<BR>

Walter Dean Myers, Norma <BR>

Julisari: ?<BR>

Shorecam: Fox Mazer, I could go on for hours. And responding to that thing<BR>

about <BR>

Shorecam: reviews, remember that VOYA magazine has an its goal to review<BR>

BOEDEN: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~Sorry, TIME IS UP FOR TONIGHT.  <BR>

Shorecam: everyting YA, and Librarians buy from VOYA. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Patty, any closing remarks?<BR>

WriterBabe: GA<BR>

Shorecam: You guys ask tough questions. But it's been fun. GA<BR>

WriterBabe: Thank you so much for being a great guest!<BR>

WriterBabe: Yeah, we're the toughies!<BR>

PHeeren: great chat, writer and boeden<BR>

WriterBabe: LOL<BR>

CGaley: Thanks Patty!<BR>

KellyMilnerH: Thanks Patty, fascinating stuff.<BR>

Julisari: Thank you, Patty!!!<BR>

</HTML>


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BOTTOM LIVE script

Evidence supporting quantum information processing in animals

ARMIES OF CHAOS