WordStar
q(Reading WORDSTAR.2000, listing time = 7:15)
[Not a favorable review, but it answers many questions.]
WORDSTAR 2000 AND WORDSTAR 2000 PLUS:
A PAIR OF JOKERS BACK-TO-BACK
January 1985
MicroPro International Corp.
33 San Pablo Ave.
San Rafael, CA 94903-4178
415/499-1200
Computers: IBM PC, XT, AT and fully compatible micro-
computers.
Operating Systems: PC-DOS or MS-DOS 2.0, 2.1 or 3.0.
Media: At least two floppy disk drives are
required; hard disk is recommended.
Required Peripherals: Color or monochrome monitor (monochrome
with or without special graphics adapter);
printer and interface adapter.
Other Requirements: Minimum 256K RAM for DOS 2.x; minimum 320K
RAM for DOS 3.0 and IBM PC AT.
Optional Items: Smartmodem compatible autodial modem to use
telecommunications feature of WordStar 2000
Plus; additional memory; additional disk
drives; electronic disk.
System used for test: 640K Compaq Portable Computer equipped with
two double-sided double-density disk
drives, electronic disk, Bizcomp Intelli-
Modem-XT, and Epson MX-80 and Qume Sprint 5
printers.
List Prices: $495 for WordStar 2000;
$595 for WordStar 2000 Plus;
$250 for WordStar 2000 or $350 for WordStar
2000 Plus when upgrading from older Word-
Star. (Mail order prices lower)
Reviewed by Ernest E. Mau
By now, just about everyone knows that MicroPro has released an
all-new WordStar for the IBM PC family. WordStar 2000 is desig-
nated a "companion" product, not a replacement for the older
WordStar.
The announcement last October was a media "event," although the
fanfare preceded product deliveries by more than a month. At the
time, WordStar 2000 sounded great. It appeared that MicroPro had
accommodated their customers in providing efficient and effective
enhancements that would make WordStar attractive when compared to
newer and more elaborate competitors.
Well, the software finally arrived. After putting it through its
paces, it's hard to believe that something this inefficient and
inconvenient would be released to a supposedly sophisticated
market of business and professional users.
Š WordStar 2000 arrives on seven diskettes (six without the Plus
features of telecommunications, indexing and mailing lists). It
installs on nine diskettes (eight without Plus) or a hard disk.
Five diskettes (four without Plus) are copyable. Two use Auto-
Install procedures to make working copies and generate extra
diskettes needed to run the system.
Two diskettes may be reclaimed later by erasing tutorials. An
obscure installation hint says that a "key disk" needed in Drive
B whenever the program is started from floppies may be copied and
used to hold data files--costing 11K of each data diskette.
Floppy management can be a problem, with plenty of diskette
swapping needed.
One DOS modification must be made during installation. A
CONFIG.SYS file is created or modified to include a FILES=20
statement needed to run the system. The user must boot DOS using
the FILES=20 statement. Another hint advises that working speed
may be improved by a BUFFERS=20 statement, which costs 10K of
RAM, works only with over 256K of installed RAM, gives less speed
improvement than suggested, and could interfere with other appli-
cation programs.
Hard disks having the "key" file available can start WordStar
2000 with a specified filename (and path) to jump right into a
document. Floppy users must boot the modified DOS diskette, swap
in the program diskette, start WordStar 2000 from Drive A with a
key disk in Drive B, swap Drive B floppies if the key file isn't
on a data disk, and manually log onto the data drive. Floppy
users cannot start WordStar 2000 with a specified filename.
WordStar 2000 is copy protected, allowing up to three copies to
be installed. Should a disk be damaged, a copy can be "uninstal-
led" to reduce the counter and allow a fresh installation. For
hard disks, the program must be uninstalled before backing up the
disk; failure to uninstall will give an unusable copy of WordStar
2000 without decrementing the counter, costing the user one
working copy.
MicroPro promised many enhancements, but the promise is largely
unfulfilled. Some improvements are attractive. Others aren't. A
few are so restrictive they're almost useless.
Paragraph reforming is automatic. Paragraphs affected by any
changes are adjusted without intervention. That's great--no more
need to use CONTROL-B to reform margins after editing.
Hyphenation is completely automatic when switched on. That's not
so great. Hyphens aren't always correctly placed or where they're
wanted. Automatic hyphens cannot be removed or relocated except
by designating words to be kept together without any hyphenation
or by manually inserting a "discretionary hyphen" before the
automatic hyphen.
Š "Format sheets" are provided and can be created by the user.
Every new document must be assigned a format that sets margins
and tabs, assigns the printer font, and so on. Available fonts
are determined according to the installed printer, but not all
possibilities may be supported. For an MX-80 with Graftrax Plus,
WordStar 2000 automatically supports normal, compressed, double
width, superscript and subscript fonts, but not italics. Program-
mers may use an "unformatted" sheet to create ASCII files without
benefit of formatting capabilities. To later change a format,
commands must be embedded in the file or the file can be copied
onto a new format sheet.
An "undo" command recovers from erroneous deletions. A "keystroke
glossary" stores information such that a typed short form abbrev-
iation automatically is replaced with a long form, say a product
name or return address. Proportional spacing printers are
supported as are color printers and sheet feeders. Some columnar
math and columnar sorting are provided. These things seem to work
well.
Windowing permits simultaneous display and editing of only two
documents. It's useful for cut-and-paste operations between docu-
ments, but really doesn't gain much.
Built-in footnoting automatically numbers footnotes but prints
them only at the end of the document. Users needing bottom-of-
page footnoting are out of luck.
The spelling proofreader is CorrectStar. It's supposed to run in
256K but wouldn't on my Compaq. I had to divert part of my
electronic disk to provide 320K of working RAM before I stopped
getting an "insufficient memory" message. The error message also
coincided with the trashing of all data files on my work disk.
Floppy users must exchange diskettes in Drive A, but CorrectStar
needs two files that it copies onto the data diskette in Drive B,
gobbling up 89K on any diskette with a file to be proofed and
increasing chances of running out of disk space.
The TelMerge portion of the Plus version is almost useless. It
supports only Hayes compatible modems. It's strange that MicroPro
would give no modem choices after providing nine menus of printer
selections. The choice of network services is limited, with only
one space to design an individual access. While it looks possible
to modify the TelMerge menu, instructions are sketchy, and the
chore will be beyond average users. There are no error checking
protocols, only ASCII transfers. Line and character delays can't
be built in, so it's easy to overrun services like CompuServe and
slow bulletin-board style receivers. TelMerge wouldn't send blank
lines except as the first or last lines, thereby losing desired
paragraph separations.
I could go on picking at flaws and apparent program "bugs," but I
need to cover the one thing that would ruin WordStar 2000 for
serious users even if everything else was perfect--its speed.
WordStar 2000 is among the slowest word processors I've seen.
Š WordStar 3.3 is no speed demon, but putting it next to WordStar
2000 is like matching a sports car to a lawnmower.
I used comparable 29K test files with 539 lines of identical text
on an electronic disk to compare various operations. Just moving
the cursor from the first to last characters took 4.5 seconds
under WordStar 3.3 (CONTROL-QC) but 75.6 seconds under WordStar
2000) (CONTROL-CE). The CONTROL-CE command cannot be interrupted
under WordStar 2000 and must run to completion. Also, just moving
the cursor tagged the file as having been changed (as seen by a
"quit-abandon" CONTROL-QA command) even though nothing had been
altered.
Another test replaced "the" with "the" throughout the file as a
whole word only, without asking for verification, and showing
each change. WordStar 3.3 took 2 minutes 30.8 seconds, while
WordStar 2000 took 10 minutes 24.1 seconds. The same search
without displaying changes took 16.5 seconds with WordStar 3.3
but 3 minutes 39.5 seconds with WordStar 2000.
After a simple find command, a "next" command may be issued to
find the next occurrence. WordStar 3.3 found the second "the" in
text so quickly with it's CONTROL-L command it couldn't be timed
accurately (less than 0.8 second). WordStar 2000 took 13.2
seconds with its CONTROL-N command because it slowly redisplayed
the entire command with options before executing.
On printing to disk, which is required to send WordStar 2000
documents via a modem, I printed from and to an electronic disk.
WordStar 3.3 finished in 1 minute 38.9 seconds, but WordStar 2000
needed 7 minutes 20.1 seconds.
Virtually every aspect of WordStar 2000 is too slow to be
practical. That slowness feeds back into other functions like
finding items to tag for indexing or converting files from one
WordStar to another, making them equally impractical.
Incidentally, WordStar and WordStar 2000 data files are not
compatible. The new files are cut off from third-party programs
like grammatical proofreaders. A conversion program provided can
move files from one WordStar to another but does only part of the
job. Converted files almost always have to be manually reformat-
ted and cleaned up, which, at the slow speed of the new program,
can take hours.
This all means that serious word processing users should avoid
WordStar 2000. Put away your checkbooks and don't, under any
circumstances, surrender old copies of WordStar to upgrade to
WordStar 2000. You could "upgrade" yourself right into ineffic-
iency and costly losses in time and productivity. Moving into
WordStar 2000 could reduce word processing output by as much as
half or two-thirds. Instead, look for revisions to the conven-
tional WordStar and WordStar Professional packages, which
continue to be fully supported MicroPro products.
Š
end of file
Comments
Post a Comment