THE FOURTH WORLD WILDERNESS CONFERENCE

                    T H E    M O N E Y C H A N G E R 

                                   

                     Vol.1, No.6, December, 1987

                Information deadline December 1, 1987

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

F.Sanders,S.P.,MONEYCHANGER*5705 Stage Rd., Suite 164*Memphis,TN.38134

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

                THE FOURTH WORLD WILDERNESS CONFERENCE:

 

                   Beware the bankers bearing gifts

 

                   An interview with Mr. George Hunt

 

 

 

     Mr. George Hunt has been an accountant for small businesses, corpo-

     rations, and partnerships for the past 18 years, specializing

     in physicians and dentists. He works also with general businesses,

     doing consulting, accounting, and tax work as well as

     investment counselling. He kindly made time for this interview

     on November 18, 1987.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - What was the Fourth World Wilderness Congress

     that took place September 11th through September 18th?

 

     HUNT - It was billed as a world-wide meeting to address global

     environmental concerns. As far as the public was concerned, it was

     produced by a chap named Ian Player, a wealthy, wealthy in-

     dustrialist of (I believe) English descent. I'm sure he'd be in

     Who's Who and so on. As I found out it was not really produced

     by him, but by the moneychangers in London and Europe.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - That is a far-reaching charge. What basis do you

     have for that?

 

     HUNT - Well, the London banker Baron Edmund de Rothschild

     was at the meeting for 6 days. Edmund de Rothschild was personally

     conducting the monetary matters and creation of this World

     Conservation Bank (WCB), in the company of I. Michael Sweatman

     of the Royal Bank of Canada. Those 2 were like Siamese twins,

     and that's why I say that it appears they were running at least 

     the money side of this conference, and I would say the conference

     was primarily to get money. Also, David Rockefeller <of Chase

     Manhattan Bank> was there, and gave a speech on Sunday.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - How many people were there?

 

     HUNT - There were 1500 from 60 countries sign up at the first

     meetings in Denver. That was first 3 days before it went up

     into the mountains, where the shirtsleeve work was done.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Into the mountains where?

 

     HUNT - We went up to Estes Park, Colorado from Monday through

     Friday, after the meetings the preceding Friday through Sunday

     afternoon at Currigan Hall in Denver. Rockefeller spoke that

     Sunday and there were keynote addresses about how great 

     this whole idea was. Then we adjourned to the YMCA camp facility

     in Estes Park for another 5 days of meetings.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - What whole idea?

 

     HUNT - Oh, conservation, ecology, the world has a chance, we're

     going to beat the ozone deterioration, we're going to get

     the rain forests back together again. The thing that really

     set me off was <Secretary of the Treasury James> Baker's talk.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Was he there?

 

     HUNT - Oh yeah, he was there. He gave the keynote address.

     He said that conservation requires "growth and development".

     There was a HUM around the audience, because they knew that "growth

     and development" are antagonistic to conservation.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Wait now. There are some code words passing here,

     aren't there? When Baker says something like that, he's talking

     in code about something else.

 

     HUNT - Exactly. He's talking in code about the *formula*,

     the "equation" of conservation and growth and development,

     that is, assets equals liabilities plus net worth. There were

     a lot of these *double intendres*.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - How did you get in to these meetings?

 

     HUNT - I was watching public television one night before the

     congress. A week earlier my 21 year old son had said to me, Dad,

     you know I'd like to go up to the Arctic and repair the rangers'

     huts up there. They need repair and I could do it, and I'd

     like to be up there alone. So I filed that away. Then as I was

     watching public television they announced that the Fourth World

     Wilderness Congress as coming to Denver Sept. 11th. They

     showed pictures of reindeer and all that kind of stuff. I said,

     Gee, that would be great, I bet I could rub elbows with the Smokies

     (the U.S. Forest Service) there, which I did by the way. There

     were 90 smokies there.

 

     So I got on the phone, and because I'm a businessman and have

     a sales background, too, I was able to wangle myself in, free

     of charge. There was a F$650 charge for attending.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Wait a minute. You're telling me that all these

     GREENIES who live out in the woods on berries and nuts came

     up with F$650 plus travel to Denver?

 

     HUNT - A good question. I think a lot of those Greenies were

     sponsored to be there. It was a contrived conference. So I called

     around and it turned out that the FINDHORN GROUP in Loveland,

     CO, were the official hosts. They call themselves "The Emissaries."

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Aren't they an occultist New Age group?

 

     HUNT - Heavy New Age, but they were in charge of the host functions

     at the Congress, and I finally wound up being interviewed

     by them. I told them I was a Christian, I was transparent with

     everybody. Turns out that a Christian within their group -- you

     know, New Age includes Christians, too, they're just off on

     a little tangent maybe <THE MONEYCHANGER vehemently disagrees

     with this statement. -Ed> -- interviewed me and I was passed

     with flying colors as a good guy to meet and greet these attendees.

     My job was to act as a host to the dignitaries, coming in from

     various parts of the world. I loved my work, because I love people,

     and I did a good job for these folks.

 

     When my work was through, I sat in on all of the meetings that 

     were of a business nature. Baker got up and spouted his "conserva-

     tion requires growth and development" line, and a lot of other

     things. I've got a copy of his speech, and it sounded good if you

     just listened to the words, but it was cloaked with a lot of

     innuendos. I said to myself, this is a SCAM. Here's the 1st

     speaker, and immediately I was alerted, because I know the history

     of these people.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - "These people" means bankers and money people,

     or New Agers, or who?

 

     HUNT - Bankers and money people. I've delved into conspiracy.

     I don't know where you're coming from on this, but I checked

     it out and researched it for 5 years and I am *convinced* there

     is a conspiracy.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Well, at the very least some kind of Insider network

     that arranges things to their own benefit.

 

     HUNT - James Baker is the Edward Mandell House <Col. House was the

     alter ego of Woodrow Wilson and a virulent elitist -- Ed.> of

     the U.S. Treasury Department. So I wrote an open letter

     of rebuttal to distribute at the meeting the next day. I printed

     700 letters. Thank God I didn't distribute them. The thing

     that caused me not to distribute it, besides fear, was compassion.

     When I saw Rothschild and Rockefeller sitting up in front before

     Rockefeller's talk, I thought, Would you want someone to do

     that to you, George, distribute a rebuttal that makes you

     look silly, when you're a national figure?

 

     As it turns out my distributing that wouldn't have any

     impact *at all* on that audience because they were either ig-

     norant or bought. But I went back to the pressroom after Rockefel-

     ler's speech, and presented it to him -- to his bodyguard really,

     his bodyguard up between me and David. He did read it, because

     the next da I received a warning from Rockefeller's office

     that I'd better stop politicking or I'd regret it. Which

     was good for me, since it made me shut my mouth and open my

     ears. I was warned by the Findhorn Group, and I complied. It

     was good that I was obedient to my superiors, because

     I was allowed to stay at the congress and hear a lot of interest-

     ing things.

 

     After the talks for the public and the newspapers were finished

     on Sunda afternoon, we went up to the shirtsleeves sessions in

     Estes Park. I had lunch with Michael Sweatman and Mr. and Mrs.

     Rothschild, and I was able to ask them how this bank was going

     to continue to operate***

 

     MONEYCHANGER - By "this bank" you mean the WCB?

 

     HUNT - Yes. I didn't see any earnings engine inside it. Where

     are the earnings coming from, if all you have in it are these

     wilderness lands, reindeer hides, and so on? I didn't say exactly

     that, but***

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Reindeer hides don't pay much of a dividend.

 

     HUNT - No. They're planning on re-financing, debt swapping <for 

     assets> one trillion dollars of Third World debt into this

     new World Conservation Bank. I told a high official of the

     Brazilian finance ministry, Dr. Jose Pedro de Oliveira-Costa,

     I don't see how this bank is going to survive. Is this really

     going to benefit Brazil?

 

     He sad, last night I could not sleep all night long. There is no

     benefit that anybody's going to get from this bank. If they

     give us a refinance, in the short run, yes, we will benefit.

     We will get soft currency from them, we'll be able to get our

     economy going again, but in the long term, he said, we won't

     be able to pay those loans back. We've devalued as far as we

     possibly can in our country, we're at the brink of poverty.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Well, how did Sweatman answer the question of

     where the earnings would come from?

 

     HUNT - He said, "We're working on that."

 

     MONEYCHANGER - <Laughter>. "We're working on that"??

 

     HUNT - "We're working on that." He's an evasive guy. In fact,

     he's already lied to <US> Senator Tim Wirth <of Colorado>.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - How will this World Conservation Bank scheme

     work exactly?

 

     HUNT - The WCB will be enacted by the United Nations, and will

     need to be approved, I wuld think, by every country participating.

     Let's assume that our senators and representatives allow 

     this thing to happen. Then the Bank will be endowed with 30%

     of the earth's land surface.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Now WHO is going to do that? Governments around

     the world will give title to their wilderness lands to th WCB?

 

     HUNT - Will give title to the lands to the World Wilderness 

     Land Inventory Trust. It will be en-trusted. Sounds good, huh?

     We know about trusts.

 

     Then this Trust will go floating into the WCB by the unanimous

     decree of the world's people, saying, God Bless you for

     saving our reindeer. That kind of a mentality is where they're

     coming from. Those people at the congress were ignorant. They

     don't suspect anything. They're VERY naive. Not stupid, ignorant.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Which people do you mean?

 

     HUNT - I'm talking about the conservationists. Conservationists

     and ecologists comprised about 60% of the people there. About 

     30% were government, United Nations and other bureaucrats. The other

     10% were world banking heavyweights who were there with axes

     to grind and pencils to sharpen.

 

     So the bank is endowed with an asset, an asset worth how many

     trillions? I don't know. Their accountants are going to evaluate

     this 50 million sqaure kilometer <twelve and a half *billion*

     acres, 5 million hectares> hunk of wilderness lands. then the 

     WCB will have the power to act as a world central bank. It can

     create soft currencies, not hard currencies, at this point. Soft

     currencies are used, as you probably know, for some purpose WITHIN

     a country. But what I picked up on is that the soft currencies

     can be spent outside of a country for environmental and ecological

     equipment. Well, hello, International Harvester, Mack Truck, 

     etc., they're going to bring those soft currencies into the

     US and we're going to have inflation.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - That will be an international currency, in other

     words. You're calling it a soft currency, but in effect it'll

     be an international currency. 

 

     HUNT - It's not an international currency in the sense 

     of a one world currency because it's not a hard currency,

     it's not legal tender for all international transactions, yet.

     Now you know and I know that by currency and debt-for-equity

     swaps they're going to wheel and deal it from soft into hard

     somehow. These guys are smart.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Let me see if I understand. A World Conservation

     Bank will be set up and into a trust will be vested title

     to 30% of the world's land surface, 12 1/2 *billion* acres. Against

     this the WCB will issue loans to various countries to buy,

     what did you say, environmental***

 

     HUNT - No, no, no, they could issue loans, but I'm talking

     specifically about currencies. They can create currencies

     for in-country use.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Well, that's issuing loans. It's the same thing.

     They will loan money for certain spceified purposes to these 

     countries. Now am I to assume that say, for example, Brazil,

     puts up the Amazon Basin, and they get credited a certain amount?

     Then there's a certain amount of loans they can draw down

     against that "deposit", so to speak?

 

     HUNT - How it will work I'm not sure. They didn't get into technique,

     they went into policies and enactments and resolutions. BUT,

     there could be a gradual loan swap for Brazil, taking them out

     of their old loans and putting them into a new WCB loan, 

     which will then sweeten the loan on the Chase Manhattan's balance

     sheet, and will take it out of non-accrual and put it back into

     the healthy loan column once again.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - or else pay it off.

 

     HUNT - Or they could pay it off, right. They could call it any 

     shot that they wanted to. They could pay them off lickety-split.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - But what's really happened is that the Brazilians

     will have given up title to millions of acres of land and in 

     exchange the Chase Manhattan will get its loan to Brazil

     paid off by the WCB.

 

     HUNT - You got it.

 

     MONEYCHANGE - I got it.

 

     <Here's how the 'Fact Sheet: World Conservation Bank' published

     by the Secretariat of the Fourth World Wilerness Congress states

     the scheme:

 

     "The World Conservation Bank would finance, direclty and through

     syndicated and co-fincancing arrangements:

 

     "1) the preparation, development, and implementation of national

     conservation strategies by developing country governments:

 

     "2) the acquisition/lease of environmentally important land

     for preservation of biological diversity and watersheds:

 

     "3) the management and conservations of selected areas.

 

     "And plans for the WCB propose that it act as intermediary

     between certain developing countries and multilateral or private

     banks to transfer a specific debt to the WCB, thus substitu-

     ting an existing 'doubtful' debt in the bank's books for a new 

     loan to the WCB. In return for having been relieved of its debt

     obligation, the debtor country would transfer to the WCB

     natural resource assets of 'equivalent value'. Or, developing

     country debts under foreign assistance programs, which have little

     hope of repayment, could be retained in-country and applied toward

     conservation, reforestation, or rural agricultural

     programs through the WCB.">

 

     HUNT - I believe that World Bank loans, as they stand now, are

     not collateralized. Now they're entering into a new era of loan

     collateralization. They're saying, Okay, the next step is that

     we ant collateral, so that when we loan-swap this debt, and we're

     going to own the Amazon if you default. Remember, as the Brazilian

     Oliveira-Costa sad, they're not going to be able to pay that off.

     That's why he couldn't sleep that night, because he *knew*

     that they were going to loose the Amazon <or whatever they put

     up as collateral>.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - These are debt for equity swaps, which they've

     been talking about for several years. They're going to make

     their bad loans good by collateralizing them after the fact

     with all of this land, and somebody, somebody, SOMEBODY is going

     to end up with title to *twelve and a half billion acres*.

     Is that right?

 

     HUNT - That's right. The collateral behind whatever loans are

     in the WCB at the time, if the WCB goes belly up. There's a whole

     see-saw of things that are going to happen. They have multi-,

     multi-trillions of dollars upon which they can create currencies

     and loans, and they're going to begin to barter and counter-

     trade and loan-swap against the United States.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Have you ever heard the name John Law?

 

     HUNT - No.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Are you familiar with the French hyperinflation

     during the French Revolution, 1792 - 1798?

 

     HUNT - Oh, yeah, when they issued assignats!

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Do you know what the assignats were? The assignats

     were the ASSIGNMENTS of a mortgage on what were called the "na-

     tional domains", and those were confiscated (mostly church) lands

     and properties. In other words, it was a scheme to *monetize*

     land. Now, what you have just described to me as the World

     Conservation Bank is a scheme to monetize land.

 

     HUNT - Very good, sir. You are right. Now I reeber John Law.

     Didn't he convince the French in the 1720s to monetize land

     in the Mississippi Bubble?

     MONEYCHANGER - No, but he had come up with a land monetization

     scheme and presented it to the Scottish parliament in about 1694,

     and he was literally laughed out of the country for it. 

     But this is the same crooked scheme, and moreover it will 

     function was a world central bank, and out of that world

     central bank there will grow a one-world flat currency system

     at the same time. This scheme is like a box of Cracker Jacks:

     it's just loaded with prizes and nuts. 

 

     How will this project be put into effect? Will it be installed

     under the auspices of the United Nations?

 

     HUNT - I think so. There was a United Nations World Commission

     on Environment and Development created in 1982 that published

     what's called the Brundtland Report, actually entitled

     OUR COMMON FUTURE <Readers can order a copy of OUR COMMON FUTURE:

     A READER'S GUIDE, which is a short abstract of the Brundtland

     Report, for F$4.00 postpaid from Earthscan, 1717 Massachusetts

     Ave. NW, Suite 302, Washington, DC 20036.>

 

     Gro Harlem Brundtland is the <Social Democrat> prime minister

     of Norway. She is the mother of four, 49 years old, and she

     was at the conference. The UN said, Brundtland, Go for it! Find out

     the conditions in our world. She came back with her study

     and said, The conditions are *terrible*. The UN then said,

     What do you recommend? And she said, I recommend a conservation

     bank, dot dot dot***

 

     Her report set the stage for unlimited enactments to take over

     ecology, environmental and pollution laws throughout the world.

     This includes international dictation to the US about its "smoke-

     stack" industries.

 

     So not only do we have a Bank forming as a result of the Brundtland

     Report, but we also have a proposal for very harsh, quasi-spiritual

     ecological laws for "Mother Earth". You're going to have a "Mother

     Earth Comes First" mentality arising throughout the world

     as a result of this legislation.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - One is tempted to say a *Mother Earth cult*.

 

     HUNT - It is already turning into a Mother Earth cult. 

     The Brundtland Report is the precipitating event for putting

     the entire scheme into effect. Brundtland was there at the 

     conference on Thursday, and I saw her receive the enactments

     and resolutions that they had created. I do not have a copy

     of them. They went underground. Senator Wirth's office

     has been looking for them. He's the only senator that has yet had

     any kind of an interest in this. I kind of wonder if he's just

     prying for the benefit of those others, because Timmy's been

     a representative or senator since 1972, so you know he's been

     pretty well processed by the one-world people. Yesterday Tim

     Mahoney from Tim Wirth's office called me and said, I talked

     to Michael Sweatman and Michael Sweatman sad they weren't

     really there at that conference to create a World Conservation

     Bank.

 

     I said, "What??" Mahoney said, They were just there to see what

     could possibly be done in that area. I said, Hey, take a look

     at that copy of Baker's speech that I sent you. He told us on

     the first day in his keynote address that the purpose of this

     congress is to create a World Conservation Bank. You know, con- 

     gressmen and senators are looking for an excuse NOT to pry. 

     This is a hot item, they don't want to touch it.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - How fast are they moving? When will they try to

     put this WCB into action?

 

     HUNT - As soon as they can, because as Rockefeller said in his

     speech, "the good news is that collapse f the monetary system

     that was predicted by some regarding each of the major borrowing

     countries has been resolved 'temporarily' by extending the debt."

 

     "Temporarily" -- that means he wants some *permanent* solutions.

     "They bad news is that lower petroleum prices in 1986 <have>

     caused countries to renegotiate the schedule for debt repay-

     ment again. The borrowing countries are in better shape because

     interest cost of servicing the nearly F$400 billion in Latin 

     American debt is still enormous. One-third of Latin America's

     Export earnings are devoted to paying interest on this debt,

     according to the Institute for International Economics in Washington.

     Two-thirds of the nearly F$400 billion in debt is owed to a number

     of commercial banks, including Chase Manhattan. Most are paying

     only interest payments, not principal, and while economic conditions

     have improved the countries still face political and structural

     problems that could hamper repayment."

 

     As you will recall I talked to Oliveira-Costa, a Brazilian finance 

     ministry official, and he said, There is no way that we could

     pay off that debt. So the bottom line says, We're going to have

     a financial collapse in our country if they DON'T get the WCB.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Then there's not much time. But you don't have

     any idea what the actual time framework is.

 

     HUNT - I tried to extract that. I had dinner with James MacNeill,

     the Secretary General, UN Commission on Environment and Development

     in Geneva. That's the commission that Gro Harlem Brundtland

     headed up which will present its report to the UN in which 

     all of these resolutions will be contained. Nobody's been able

     to find out where it is. I think they're going to pull a little

     Federal Reserve trick on us, you know, present it sometime

     like midnight on December 25th, when nobody's watching. 

 

     At the congress I said to Michael Sweatman, There is no earnings

     engine in the balance sheet of this bank that I can see, and you're

     taking in wilderness properties and trillions of dollars

     in bad debts. Where are the earnings going to come from to keep

     this bank afloat? He answered, We're working on that; you'll

     have a chance to express your concerns and your questions in a 

     half and hour at our caucus.

 

     I said Sure, you're going to call on me. This thing seems to be

     contrived from the beginning to the end, frankly. He said,

     No, I'll call on you. I sad, "You promise?" He said, "I promise."

 

     He did not call on me. There was NO pro and con offered at

     the caucus, it was just Baron de Rothschild spouting non-entities.

     He said, Innovation is the key to the pollution problem. We need

     growth and development. For instance, we have a CO2 problem. 

     I propose that we create large dry ice machines that will absorb

     the CO2 from the atmosphere, and then take the dry ice 

     that we create and take it up to the polar ice cap to keep it from

     melting.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Oh, come off it.

 

     HUNT - I am NOT kidding. I said to myself, That guy has either

     lost his mind, or***

 

     MONEYCHANGER - (uncontrollable laughter and howling)

 

     HUNT - ***or he is just *laughing* at us. Isn't that something?

     And by the way, I've got the whole conference on tape.

 

     At the end of the caucus, Baron Rothschild, "You have decided.

     This will be a second World Marshall Plan." And I said to myself,

     "Did we say *that*? Nobody said anything here." When I got home

     I realized the significance of what he had said. That will be a 

     resolution, because he wrote it on a resolution sheet, I saw

     him do it. That means that the governments are going to guarantee

     the debt of thw WCB. Now Russia was a lot of the wilderness

     lands, and I see that Russia is going to get a lot of  the

     loans. When they default, and the US is going to be the turkey

     again.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - But still, in the end, SOMEBODY is going to end

     up with title to those lands, and I suggest that these somebodies

     are these same moneyed interests that were so much in evidence

     at this Fourth World Wilderness Conference.

 

     HUNT - Exactly, and they're going to be in back of the bank loaning

     currency and cash flow to the WCB to keep it alive, to give it

     the *appearance* of profitability. The bank will be running

     on an accrual basis. On paper it will be recognizing profits

     received on interests, but the interests will NOT be coming in

     because these countries cannot pay. So my hypothesis is that

     the kings, capitalists, and moneychangers of the world will be

     in the back of this bank in the position of *creditors*.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

     For part 2 of this file, see OWGART1.003 

                                           --- Mike Carrillo

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

          MONEYCHANGER - The Federal Reserve type scheme, the central bank

     scheme, which was set up to loot individual nations, will now be

     raised to the nth power on the international level. A central

     bank will be set up to loot the whole world, and to transfer

     title for (literally) the assets of the world to these people.

 

     HUNT - You've got it.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - What about media at the conference? I never heard

     or say anything printed about the Fourth World Wilderness

     Conference.

 

     HUNT - There was local coverage. You've got to have a mindset 

     like yours and mine to know that anything newsworthy was going 

     on there.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - Otherwise, it just looks like a bunch of Greenies

     blathering about the environment.

 

     HUNT - Exactly. You just saw a bunch of ecological laws, blah,

     blah, blah, blah. But they *were* important because all the laws

     proposed by that conference are laws they intend for every citizen

     of the world to respect. You can't make poo-poo on the ground, 

     you've gotta dig a hole a foot deep and 6 inches wide, and all 

     that kind of stuff: that's what we'll see coming down. We're 

     going to be forced to recyle our garbage and***

 

     MONEYCHANGER - So there's a recipe for totalitarianism in the 

     Brundtland Report, too?

 

     HUNT - Oh, yes, sir! Nebuchadnezzar type of stuff, worship

     the statue whenever you hear the sound of the lute. They have

     set the stage for governmnt control of the earth's people with

     their environmental laws. It's also going to create depressions,

     it's going to wind down capitalism.

 

     The looting of the wealth of our country is going to create 

     inflation, so Americans are not going to be able to pay their

     loans to Majestic Savings and Loan or Columbia Title. They're

     going to see ads in the paper -- by the way, I read in the Sept.

     14th issue of TIME, that William Simon (Nixon's Treasury Secretary)

     has bought up a lot of saving and loans in California --

     people are going to see signs encouraging the to "get a World

     Conservation Bank loan and help your environment while you help

     yourself." They will see very favorable loan payments, so they'll

     loan-swap their mortgage into the WCB. The WCB will end up

     owning the wealth of nations, including government and 

     industry and the private sector, all over the world.

 

     MONEYCHANGER - They'll just take "debt for equity" swap technique

     and apply it to the maximum. Thanks very mch, Mr. Hunt.

     (End of interview)

 

                           COMMENTS & CONCLUSIONS

 

     Are these just the frenzied intrigues of desparate multinational

     megabanks, environmental fanatics, and UN bureaucrats, or is 

     there some substance to them? Consider this quotation from US

     Treasury Secretary James Baker's keynote address to the Fourth

     World Wilderness Congress:

 

     "***we at Treasury are looking closely at ideas that some

     of you here today have brought to our attention that would

     convert some <Lesser Developed Countries> (LDC) debt to

     local currency specifically earmarked for use for environmental

     activities and sound development projects. There is some 

     question as to whether this would require legislation or might be

     done by interpretation of current rules. We are still working

     on the complicated technicalities but I can tell you this:

     *we believe in the concept and are working to produce results.*"

 

     Translation: We don't care whether existing United States laws

     must be broken or circumvented, we don't care that this

     means renouncing the sovereignty of the United States,

     we already have the plan and we are working out the details

     right now.

 

     As further proof of the Treasury Department's "sincerity",

     the WALL ST. JOURNAL on page 14 reported Nov. 19th, "The Treasury

     is offering guidance to US banks on how they can get substantial

     tax benefits by selling Third World debt and donating the 

     proceeds to charitable <sic> causes. The concept has been

     pushed by environmental groups which hope to encourage banks

     to contribute to conservation groups through more so-

     called debt-for-nature swaps. Legislation designed to promote

     such swaps is pending in both houses of Congress. International

     Revenue Service ruling 87-124 spells out the criteria banks

     must meet in such arrangements. *** Under a prearranged

     plan witht the <debtor> country's central bank, the US bank

     exchanges the debt for payment in that nation's currency

     that must be used in the country. The US bank could take a charit-

     able deduction equal to the fair market value of the local currency

     it received. It also could take a loss equal to the difference 

     between the fair market value of the currency and the original 

     amount of the loan. The other scenarios deal with situations

     in which US banks or corporations in the developing countries."

     (Translation: US taxpayers will be forced to underwrite the banks'

     write-offs.)

 

     On October 1, 1987 the WALL ST. JOURNAL had reported that this

     same "conservationist" Treasury Secretary James Baker suggested 

     that gold play a role in setting currency rates, speaking at

     the World Bank and Internation Monetary Fund annual meetings

     in Washington. "*** the Baker proposal, if adopted by other

     major nations, *would be another major step toward closer management

     of world economic and monetary policies.* *** The Baker 

     proposal would introduce a strong price-sensitive measure into

     the *secret economic planning* process the big countries

     use to *coordinate their economic policies and stabilize exchange

     rates.* *** Mr. Baker's speech was bolstered by a separate

     address by British Chancellor of the Exchequer Nigel  

     Lawson. He called for formalizing the current ad hoc system

     of setting secret exchange-rate ranges and suggested tying 

     currency values *and economic policies* to industrial-world

     growth and inflation***" (p.3, emphases added).

 

     Note in the above article that someone is talking about *coordinat-

     ting national economic and monetary policies on an international

     level*. This is the pressure from the other side of the 

     pincer movement: on the one side the World Conservation Bank is

     established to bail the banks out of their bad LDC loans and

     collateralize them. It can also function as a *world central

     bank*. On the other side sovereign nations are pressured to

     renounce their sovereignty over internal economic and monetary

     matters and cede that sovereignty to some international

     group. In fact, this "co-ordination and co-operation" is

     *already* taking place to a limited degree within existing inter-

     national monetary institutions.

 

     NOW put this pincers movement into the perspective of Richard

     Cooper's plan for a world central bank published in the Fall, 

     1984 issue of FOREIGN AFFAIRS, the official publication

     of the elitist Council on Foreign Affairs. The primary precondi-

     tion for that one-world bank scheme is *international cooridna-

     tion of monetary and economic policy by ceding control of

     the same to some international world central bank, with

     a common one-world currency*.

 

     "Exchange rates can be most credibly fixed if they are eliminated

     altogether, that is, if international transactions take place

     with a single currency. But a single currency is possible only

     if there is in effect a single monetary policy, and a single 

     authority issuing the currency and directing that monetary

     policy. How can independent states accomplish that? *They need

     to turn over the determination of monetary policy to a 

     supramational body* *** The key point is that monetary control --

     the issuance of currency and of reserve credit -- would be in 

     the hands of the new Bank of Issue <i.e., World Central Bank -

     Ed.>, not in the hands of any national government board of gover-

     nors***. *No single country would be in control*. *** the Bank

     of Issue would have a *certain autonomy* <a monumental under-

     statement - Ed.> by virtue of not being beholden to any single

     legislative or executive authority. Thus it could not be manipu-

     lated for particular electoral reasons." (Translation:

     the World Central Bank couldn't be called to account or controlled

     by any nation.)

 

     Finally, Mr. Cooper gives us another dose of the "urge to merge":

     "*** it is highly doubtful whether the American public, to take

     just one example, could ever accept that countries with oppressive

     autocratic regimes should vote on the monetary policy that would

     affect monetary conditions in the United States. <Translation:

     how are going to get the American people to swallow the cession

     of their economic and monetary sovereignty to an international

     collective including the Soviet Union and Red China? - Ed.>

     For such a bold step to work at all it presupposes a certain

     convergence of political values as reflected in the nature

     of political decision-making***." (FOREIGN AFFAIRS,

     Fall 1984, passim)

 

     While pressue is building in the UN puppet theater through the

     Brundtland Report for a World Conservation Bank to bail out

     the banks, AND for totalitarian international control

     of national economic development and trade, of agriculture

     and food production, of the environment, of economic planning,

     of population planning and human resources (I hate these eupemisms:

     they give me images of interchangeable human repair parts,

     stacked like cordwood in a refrigerated warehouse somewhere. 

     They are also code words for abortion and euthanasia), of education,

     of urban planning, of energy production (they HATE nuclear

     power, the cleanest, cheapest power presently known), of

     the exploitation of the oceans and of space, of international

     law, and most importantly, of a so-called equitable redistribution

     of assets world-wide (most vociferously supported by those countries

     who have no assets to re-distribute), pressure has already

      been building for years in that same internationalist Punch-and-

      Judy show for the so-called 'New International Economic

      Order' (NIEO). It's a classic pincers movement: pressure

     from above, and pressure from below.

 

     Here's another bit of evidence, from an article in the Australian

     publication THE FREE MARKET for Sept. '87, by renowned US libertarian

     economist, Dr. Murray Rothbard.

 

     "Fortunately, a lack of market confidence and inability to co-

     ordinate dozens of governments have so far spared us this

     Keynesian ideal <of a world central bank>. But now, a cloud no

     bigger than a man's hand, an ominous trial balloon toward a 

     World Reserve Bank has just been floated. In a meeting in Hamburg,

     West Germany, in late June of 200 leading world bankers in an

     international monetary conference, bankers urged the eilimina-

     tion of the current volatile exchange rate system and a 

     move towards fixed exchange rates.

 

     "The theme of the conference was set by its chairman,

     Willard C. Butcher, chairman and chief executive of Rockefeller's

     Chase Manhattan Bank. Butcher attacked the current system,

     and warned that it could not correct itself and that a search

     for a better world currency system 'must be intensified' (NEW YORK

     TIMES, 6/23/87).

 

     "It was not long before Toyoo Gyohten, Japan's vice-minister

     of finance for international affairs, spelled out some

     of the concrete implications of this accelerated search.

     Gyohten proposed a huge multinational financial institution,

     possessing 'at least several hundred billion dollars,' 

     that would be empowered to intervene in world financial markets

     to reduce volatility. And what is this if not the beginnings

     of a World Reserve Bank? Are Keynesian dreams at last beginning

     to come true?"

 

     Another recent article bears mentioning, namely "Latin American

     debt" by Pedro-Pablo Kuczynski in the Fall, 1987 issue of

     FOREIGN AFFAIRS. Mr. Kuczynski outlines a three fold new

     approach to the debt proble, namely, economic reforms in

     debtor nations, and new capital inflows. The World Conservation

     Bank scheme fits all three.

 

     In the end, what have we got here? Have we "proven" that a world-

     wide "conspiracy" is trying to institute a world central bank, a 

     one-world currency, and international economic totalitarianism?

     Well, no. If you made that charge, the maggots at work would

     just stand up and say, There's nobody here but us concerned

     and public-spirited financiers, bureaucrats, and do-gooders.

     Since your and I, readers, can't be privy to the counsels of the 

     international insider banking network, we just have to look

     at what they are doing, saing, and writing to understand where

     they are headed. And that is:

 

     1. They are trying to establish a Wilderness Conservation

    Bank to bail the banks out of their deadbeat Third World Loans.

     In the process they stand to get title to 30% of the world's 

     land. (Code words "fresh capital", "new capital inflows", "debt

     for equity swaps", "privatization", "multilateral development

     bunks".)

 

     2. They are tring to establish an international socialist

     state, by controlling the economy, law, and environment of the

     world, through the United Nations and UN accords and treaties.

     This will be done NOT by the outward and visible imposition

     of a one world government, but by the inward and unremarkable

     signing of U.N. treaties and accords, by which national constitu- 

     tions are subverted and national sovereignty step by step 

     resigned. whatever the outward accidents, the inward essence

     is totalitarian socialism on a world-wide scale. (Code words:

     "New International Economic Order", "restructuring of debtor

     countries' economies", "economic reform")

 

     3. They must have a world central bank as a means to international

     financial and economic control, and they have plans for it

     already in the word. The IMF, the World Bank, or the Wilerness

     Conservation Bank could be maneuvered to fit this bill. (Code 

     words: "fixed exchange rates", "exchange rate stability",

     "multilateral development banks".)

 

     4. A helpful, but not necessarily indispensable concomitant

     of this plan would be a one-world flat currency. Failing this,

     at least some system of fixed currency exchange rates is indispens-

     able. This can be accomplished by "gold-plating" an

     international flat monetary standard. There already exists a one-world

     currency, namely gold, but this is too hard to control since not

     all of it is in the hands of the bankers. The situation is analogous

     to the demonetization of silver in the 19th century and establishment

     of a world-wide gold standard, where the gold, but not the

     silver, was already for the most part in the hands of the moneyed

     interests. The advantage of a flat standard over gold is obvious,

     namely, an utter monopoly on the creation of money without any in-

     ventory cost, resulting in total monetary and thereby near-total

     economic control. (Code words: "fixed

     exchange rates", "exchange rate stability".)

 

     5. These plans for world economic control cannot succeed as

     long as nations retain sovereignty over economic and monetary

     affair. Some international co-ordination of these affair is already

     in place in existing international monetary arrangements

     (Group of 5. Group of 7, etc.), and this will be parleyed and

     extended from the voluntary to the compulsory. (Code words: "co-

     operation", "economic or monetary policy coordination".)

 

     6. Although these plans have been in the works for many years,

     they are just now rapidly approaching fruition. The looming

     financial da of reckoning in the world economy can provide the 

     crisis necessary to justify the installation of these totalitarian

     measures. Events are moving rapidly to a final unfolding.

 

     7. Like the man who rides the tiger, the rid may be fun but the

     dismounting can be lethal. Take a ride in a jet sometime, about

     10 minutes after takeoff look out the window; get an idea of just

     how huge the world is. The world economy is just that enormous,

     and just that baffling, made up of billions of decisions from

     the minute to the majestic by millions of players. The one-worlders

     are fooling themselves: it can't be controlled. Disrupted and

     nearly ruined, perhaps, but not controlled. The international 

     bankers have been on a flat debt money tiger ride for a long time,

     but now they have to climb off. With malice toward none we can

     certainly hope the stiped beast they have created will now turn

     and shred them.

 

     It should be obvious from the above that if you are to protect

     yourself from these plans, you will have to get out of the debt-

     money financial system as much as possible. It's *your* assets

     they intend to control and redistribute. If you leave them in the 

     banking and financial system, you're a sitting duck on a still

     pond. Reduce your exposure to the banking system as much as possible.

     Eliminate ALL you debt. Convert assets into the only money

     that remains at least partially outside the internationalists'

     control, gold. And batten down your economic hatches. -- F.Sanders.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

     THE MONEYCHANGER, formerly GOLD & SILVER SUPDATE, is a privately

     circulated newsletter, published 12 times yearly, usually

     monthly. Our purpose is to help Christians prosper with their

     principles intact in an age of monetary and moral chaos. All informa- 

     tion is derived from sources believed to be accurate, but

     accuracy, cannot be guaranteed. We may have positions

     in the items we recommend. We cannot guarantee the profitability

     of any investment. All recommendations are made subject to

     the reader's own prudence, research, and judgement. Common law

     copyright 1987. Persmission to reprint granted provided quotations

     are not used out of contect and full subscription information 

     is given. Price: 12 issues, six silver dollars ($6.50 in 90%

     silver coin) or other gld or silver equivalent; F$65 if you

     have nothing but paper 'money'. Franklin Sanders, Moneychanger,

     S.P., P.O. Box 341753, Memphis, Tennessee 38184. Single Copies,

     $.65 in silver, F$6 in paper. 

 

 

     Additional information concerning this subject will be uploaded

     in the near future as a part of a series of files on this subject.

     ANY and ALL information that you may have concerning this topic

     may be sent to Mike Carrillo, 2419 Forest Shadows, St. Louis,

     MO, 63136. You may also contact me on Wierdbase (314) 741-2231,

     CIA (314) 739-0262, or the Darkside BBS (314) 298-7486.

 

                            OTHER RELATED FILES:

     GUNCTL.TXT -   Gun Control and the Plot for a Fascist Police

                    State in America by David Hammer (also provides

                    information concerning Rockefeller and the Trilateral

                    Commission which has openly called for "restricting

                    democracy").

 

     OWGTAPE1.001 - ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT, an interview with G. Hunt

                    (see also OWGTAPE1.002) 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------