Childrens Writers chat - Clarion

 Guests: Michele Coppola, formerly at S&S and now at Clarion, and Julie Strauss-Gabel, also of Clarion.



Tuesdays 

9 p.m. ET (6 p.m. PT), Writers Workshop

Children's Writers chat - writers and illustrators of children's books meet for specific topics and special guest speakers, moderated by HOST WRTR WBABE & HOST WRTR CGaley, with HOST WRTR sUe & HOST WRTR Neely (Greeters).


<HTML><FONT  SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><B>CWC log 10-26-99</B><BR>

 Date: 10/26/99 <BR>

 <BR>

 Guest speakers: Michele Coppola, formerly at S&S and now at Clarion, and Julie<BR>

 Strauss-Gabel, also of Clarion.<BR>

 </FONT><FONT  SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SCRIPT" FACE="Comic Sans MS" LANG="0">CWC Log 10-26-99<BR>

</FONT><FONT  SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>

 WriterBabe: Tonight I'm delighted to welcome a returning guest and a new<BR>

 one:<BR>

 WriterBabe: Michele Coppola, formerly at S&S and now at Clarion, and Julie<BR>

 Strauss-Gabel, also of <BR>

 WriterBabe: Clarion.<BR>

 WriterBabe: Hiya, gals!<BR>

 North110: Hi there!<BR>

 WriterBabe: Before I hit you with questions, would you like to make any<BR>

 opening remarks?  GA<BR>

 North110: We're ready for questions<BR>

 WriterBabe: LOL.  Okay.<BR>

 WriterBabe: I'll start with Michele.<BR>

 WriterBabe: What, if any, difference is there between the books you're<BR>

 acquiring for Clarion as opposed <BR>

 WriterBabe: to the ones you acquired at S&S?<BR>

 WriterBabe: I think we'd like to know a bit about small houses vs. big ones.<BR>

 GA<BR>

 North110: In terms of my interests, they haven't changed--I'm still looking<BR>

 for good books for toddler<BR>

 North110: as well as fresh, funny middle grade fiction. The advantage<BR>

 North110: of a smaller house is that I can--hopefully--sign up more new<BR>

 writers.GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: As you said, one of your specialities is the young picture book.<BR>

 WriterBabe: What makes a good p.b.?  Please talk about PLOT!  GA<BR>

 North110: In terms of young picture books, I think the story has to relate<BR>

 to a toddler's real life <BR>

 North110: experience. I'm looking for stories that deal with different <BR>

 North110: aspects of their emotional development ie independence vs.<BR>

 security, <BR>

 North110: learning through play, etc. GA<BR>

 Neely f: (If your IMs are not turned on, I can not send you a greeting.)<BR>

 WriterBabe: Could you talk a bit about plot, Michele?  Then I have some<BR>

 questions for Julie.  GA<BR>

 North110: I like stories with strong beginnings, middles and endings. I like<BR>

 it when the problem is <BR>

 North110: specified right away--you dont' want to waste words in a picture<BR>

 book!GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: You feel that there are some pretty thin or limp p.b.s out<BR>

 there?  GA<BR>

 North110: I think that many people feel they have to sacrifice story for<BR>

 simplicity in young picture<BR>

 North110: books. I think you can have both! GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: Thanks, Michele.<BR>

 WriterBabe: Julie, among other things, you're interested in s.f. and<BR>

 fantasy.<BR>

 WriterBabe: With the huge success of Harry Potter for Scholastic, what can<BR>

 seriously compete in the <BR>

 WriterBabe: marketplace with that?<BR>

 WriterBabe: What advice can you offer to fantasy and s.f. writers?  GA<BR>

 North110: Well, before Harry Potter there were many successful books and<BR>

 series in the fantasy genre<BR>

 North110: books that I would certainly consider enduring classics and<BR>

 personal childhood favorites<BR>

 North110: there is something special about (really exceptionally written)<BR>

 fantasy that speaks to young<BR>

 North110: readers that endures - there may not be room for HP wannabes in<BR>

 the market<BR>

 North110: but I think there will always be a place for great stories that<BR>

 speak to children<BR>

 North110: I think that sometimes fantasy can achieve that in ways more<BR>

 conventional pieces cannot<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: Wow, that was marvelously articulate, Julie!<BR>

 North110: thanks :)<BR>

 WriterBabe: Do you have any caveats or tips to give writers of these genres?<BR>

 GA<BR>

 North110: Well, similar to Michele's admonition about picture books - I<BR>

 think that the conventions of <BR>

 North110: fantasy writing can be so familiar (almost cliche) that you have<BR>

 to<BR>

 North110: be extra careful to develop plot and character without falling<BR>

 back<BR>

 North110: on familiar territory - unoriginal territory - that's why I think<BR>

 it's so hard to write <BR>

 North110: it well GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: Good advice.<BR>

 WriterBabe: Julie, you're also interested in unique non-fiction.  Please<BR>

 elaborate on that.  <BR>

 WriterBabe: What subjects are fertile ground for exploration?  What hasn't<BR>

 been done before?  GA<BR>

 North110: Well, Clarion has always been known for our strong nonfiction list<BR>

 North110: and I have been lucky enough to work on a lot of these books<BR>

 North110: But really fascinating nonfiction, in my opinion, takes on topics<BR>

 that are not only<BR>

 North110: unique - people, events, etc. that haen't been explored - but also<BR>

 subjects<BR>

 North110: that really speak to the emotional needs of kids as much as<BR>

 fiction does<BR>

 North110: subjects that inspire and answer life questions<BR>

 North110: Michele adds that there is also a need for science for toddlers<BR>

 North110: that is more play-oriented<BR>

 North110: And, one more thing, I think that as school curriculums are<BR>

 changing and the arts are being<BR>

 North110: sacrified - people should not be afraid to look at people and<BR>

 events in these areas as well<BR>

 North110: as more history-oriented projects (which, I think, tend to<BR>

 dominate the field)<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: You two are terrific!  You've given us much to think about.<BR>

 WriterBabe: I want to ask one more head-'em-off-at-the-pass question, then<BR>

 open this to the audience.<BR>

 WriterBabe: Lots of folks here worry about cover letters (not queries--cover<BR>

 letters accompanying a<BR>

 WriterBabe: manuscript).  What do you want to see in a cover letter?  GA<BR>

 North110: Let me just say that we had a suspicion that this might come up :)<BR>

 WriterBabe: LOL.  I wonder why?  :-><BR>

 North110: We agree that what really needs to speak for your work is your<BR>

 work - the manuscript itself<BR>

 North110: We often return to the cover letter, looking for more personal<BR>

 info.<BR>

 North110: But I don't think that either one of us really feels the need, or<BR>

 is lured, by a pitch<BR>

 North110: Personally (Julie) I'd prefer a clean, very professional cover<BR>

 letter than anything else<BR>

 North110: But do include any writing credentials and if you're writing<BR>

 nonfiction tell us about your<BR>

 North110: research - esp. if your book is the only one of its kind<BR>

 North110: If it's a nonfiction proposal, it is important to tell us where<BR>

 you're going with the <BR>

 North110: project if it's not complete<BR>

 North110: We also agree about a few things we don't want to see:<BR>

 North110: Pages and pages of marketing suggestions (and toy tie-in ideas)<BR>

 North110: and scheduling demands - like, publish this by Christmas '99<BR>

 Boro1burs: has anyone ever read Sleepy, it's a short story by Anton Checof<BR>

 North110: Also, while we enjoy them, personal photos aren't necessary<BR>

 North110: And be sure to call ahead and confirm that the editor is still at<BR>

 the house, his/her title, <BR>

 North110: and name spelling<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 CGaley: (Borolburs, we're in protocol.  Please wait to be called on! :-))<BR>

 Boro1burs: sorry<BR>

 WriterBabe: Don't you want to know the writer's astrological sign?  ;-)<BR>

 WriterBabe: Thanks for your terrific answers.<BR>

 WriterBabe: And now, gang, it's your turn.<BR>

 CarolynB34: ?<BR>

 WriterBabe: Type ? or !<BR>

 North110: Only if you're a taurus or a libra - otherwise, no<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: Ooh, I feel privileged, being a Libra myself.<BR>

 Jgregers: ?<BR>

 WriterBabe: Carolyn, you're up first.<BR>

 CarolynB34: Regarding manuscripts that you are strongly considering for<BR>

 publication but you <BR>

 CarolynB34: ultimately reject, can you identify one or more major flaws<BR>

 CarolynB34: you find that prevents you from publishing them?  GA<BR>

 North110: In general?  Or is the question if we strive to send this<BR>

 information to the author?<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 CarolynB34: In general<BR>

 CarolynB34: not what the author is told -- just your thought process<BR>

 North110: sometimes characters aren't well developed, the story/plot has<BR>

 flaws<BR>

 CarolynB34: !<BR>

 North110: sometimes it;s a matter of timing, or the market, if there are<BR>

 similar projects, or we just <BR>

 North110: did something very similar and the project might not stand out in<BR>

 that sea<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 CarolynB34: can marketability alone sink an otherwise great story?<BR>

 WriterBabe: Good question, Carolyn.<BR>

 North110: Not a great story, no  - but sometimes even good, solid, stories<BR>

 lack a spark that would<BR>

 North110: really make it worth fighting for<BR>

 North110: BUT at Clarion we really are editorially driven - but AS EDITORS,<BR>

 we still have to consider <BR>

 RoxyanneY: ?<BR>

 RosaPearI: ?<BR>

 MaryCronk: ?<BR>

 North110: the market - not just for the house, but for the success of your<BR>

 project<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: Jg, you're next.<BR>

 Jgregers: How do you describe voice?  Or a compelling voice?  One compelling<BR>

 enough to publish?<BR>

 CarolynB34: thanks!<BR>

 North110: A good voice is part of having a good character - it's knowing who<BR>

 that person is, it's that<BR>

 North110: voice that is the reader's lifeline to the rest of the book<BR>

 North110: Voice is the way writer's distinguish who they are - their<BR>

 distinct mark on the story<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: Your answers are terrific.<BR>

 Inkdot100: ?<BR>

 WriterBabe: Roxy, go ahead.<BR>

 RoxyanneY: Could you expand on your comment about science for toddlers?<BR>

 Maybe an example? My daughter <BR>

 RoxyanneY: and I made ice cubes yesterday in dolphin-shaped trays. Is that<BR>

 what you mean by play-like?<BR>

 RoxyanneY: GA<BR>

 Writes4kdz: ?<BR>

 North110: Yes! There are a lot of good science books out there but most of<BR>

 them are too complicated/<BR>

 North110: advanced for this age group. And toddlers learn so much through<BR>

 play. GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: Rosa, you're up next.<BR>

 RosaPearI: Is it difficult for a new author to get published in this genre?<BR>

 RosaPearI: /ga<BR>

 North110: Do you mean young picture books?GA<BR>

 RoxyanneY: Thank you [and I won't pitch that with the obvious toy icetray<BR>

 tie-in. :)  ]<BR>

 WriterBabe: LOL<BR>

 RosaPearI: actually both, I entertain my grandson (1)  and my own (7-8-14)<BR>

 RosaPearI: /ga<BR>

 North110: Which genre? GA  (Sorry to be confused)<BR>

 RosaPearI: P.B and fiction for elementary<BR>

 North110: If you have a good story to tell, it will get noticed!GA<BR>

 RosaPearI: thank you /ga<BR>

 WriterBabe: Mary, your turn.<BR>

 MaryCronk: Is there much room or call for middle-grade realistic fiction<BR>

 right now?(that's not humor)GA<BR>

 WriterRoss: ?<BR>

 North110: Yes, again if it's a strong story, it will stand out. I (Michele)<BR>

 happen to be particularly <BR>

 North110: interested in humor for this age group.GA<BR>

 MaryCronk: what about non-humorous?<BR>

 MaryCronk: GA<BR>

 North110: Sure, if it's well written and unusual.GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: Ink, fire away.<BR>

 Inkdot100: How do you decide which books in your list you 'get behind' in<BR>

 terms of promotion?  In what <BR>

 Inkdot100: way do reviews matter?<BR>

 Inkdot100: GA<BR>

 North110: Clarion prides itself on supporting its backlist and supporting<BR>

 authors<BR>

 North110: We try to make sure that our frontlist goes out to every key<BR>

 reviewer/journal/etc - and get <BR>

 North110: behind our projects.<BR>

 North110: We don't let books get ignored or die - but there's never the<BR>

 decision to really push some <BR>

 North110: books at the expense of others - we try to get them all out there<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 Inkdot100: OK, thanks.<BR>

 WriterBabe: Writes4, go ahead.<BR>

 Writes4kdz: Since Clarion is editorial driven, how much of finished product<BR>

 do you have to see in a ms? <BR>

 Writes4kdz: 90% there?<BR>

 Writes4kdz: GA<BR>

 North110: Do you mean if we want to see a complete ms submitted? Or do you<BR>

 mean does it need to be<BR>

 North110: near perfect at the time of submission? GA<BR>

 Writes4kdz: How near perfect? <BR>

 North110: Near perfect enough that we get a sense of your skill as a writer<BR>

 and a storyteller<BR>

 North110: we all pride ourselves on working with authors and editing<BR>

 manuscripts - and things always<BR>

 North110: change, evolve, get edited over time after they're accepted<BR>

 North110: but we still want to see your best work - we need to see how well<BR>

 you write<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 Writes4kdz: Thank you!<BR>

 WriterBabe: WRoss, you're next.<BR>

 WriterRoss: When you take on a manuscript, where do you begin your work as<BR>

 its editor? What do you love<BR>

 WriterRoss: about your roles as editors? Thanks.<BR>

 North110: My work begins the moment I see your manuscript. The fun begins<BR>

 once I can see something--<BR>

 North110: and then it's a matter of talking to the author to see if their<BR>

 vision matches mine. I don't<BR>

 Neely f: %^%^%^%^   5 MINUTE WARNING %%^%%^<BR>

 North110: like reading manuscripts nearly as much as I like talking about<BR>

 them with my writers and <BR>

 North110: working out solutions.GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: (Who's speaking--Michele or Julie, or both?)<BR>

 WriterRoss: Visions and voices. Thanks, Michelle and Julie. <BR>

 North110: that happened to be Michele - but we've been sharing - sorry<BR>

 WriterRoss: Sharing a common voice and vision. :><BR>

 WriterBabe: Thanks.<BR>

 WriterRoss: Thanks-- all done.<BR>

 WriterBabe: The queue's empty.  Any other questions, folks?<BR>

 MaryCronk: ?<BR>

 Writes4kdz: ?<BR>

 WriterBabe: Mary, go ahead.<BR>

 RoxyanneY: ?<BR>

 MaryCronk: thoughts on simultaneous subs??<BR>

 North110: I think we both feel that simultaneous is okay to the slush pile<BR>

 North110: but if you're targeting an editor, better to send out one at a<BR>

 time, with a deadline if you <BR>

 North110: like . . . If you're sending something to us that you're telling<BR>

 us is perfect<BR>

 North110: for our tastes and our needs - but note that it also went to 5<BR>

 other people <BR>

 North110: for whom it would always be "perfect" it doesn't make sense<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: Well, it could be perfect for everyone?  LOL<BR>

 WriterBabe: Writes4, go ahead.<BR>

 Writes4kdz: How full are your lists now? Also, what's the response time for<BR>

 Clarion right now?<BR>

 Writes4kdz: GA<BR>

 North110: We're probably acquiring for 2001 and beyond right now<BR>

 North110: and we're always looking at things, of course . . . <BR>

 North110: As for response time, it varies by editor and depends on lots of<BR>

 things<BR>

 North110: Time of year, etc.  For example, we're in a short season now, and<BR>

 less able to read<BR>

 North110: as much/as quickly as we might be able to at a slower time of the<BR>

 year<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 Writes4kdz: Is there a better time of year to submit than others?<BR>

 Writes4kdz: GA<BR>

 North110: It depends on the house, but I think that fall/winter tends to be<BR>

 busier in most places<BR>

 North110: it's like back to school - summer can be slower (but not too<BR>

 slow!)<BR>

 North110: But don't send us stuff next summer - we're both getting married<BR>

 in August<BR>

 North110: GA<BR>

 WriterBabe: Every season is busy as far as I can see.  ;-)<BR>

 WriterBabe: LOL, Michele and Julie--and mazel tov, as my mom would say.<BR>

 WriterBabe: Roxy, last question.<BR>

 RoxyanneY: What's your dream submission?  What would you love to see on your<BR>

 desk tomorrow? ga <BR>

 Writes4kdz: Aug. 15th bride here. (12 years ago ; )<BR>

 Writes4kdz: thanks!<BR>

 WriterRoss: (You know, I've noticed a lot of people in publishing marry in<BR>

 August.) []<BR>

 North110: Summer Fridays Marilyn<BR>

 North110: whoops - wrong person! Sorry!<BR>

 WriterBabe: LOL<BR>

 North110: Julie: The next Winnie the Pooh<BR>

 WriterBabe: Talking animals, Julie?<BR>

 North110: But, seriously, something that really gets under my skin, touches<BR>

 me and<BR>

 North110: makes me feel as excited about reading that mansucript as I<BR>

 North110: did when reading my fav books as a kid<BR>

 North110: Something that takes me back and forget who and where I am - <BR>

 North110: I felt that way when I read HOLES, btw.<BR>

 North110: Marilyn, you know I want to reach those 11-13 year old girls, so<BR>

 give me the next ARE YOU <BR>

 Neely f: ^*^*^**^*^**   -5 MINUTE WARNING  *^**^*^* LOL<BR>

 North110: THERE GOD, IT'S ME MARGARET! (Michele)GA<BR>

 RoxyanneY: Excellent, thank you both, and best wishes on your weddings.<BR>

 North110: thanks<BR>

 WriterBabe: That does it for time, folks.  Julie and Michele, any final<BR>

 remarks?  GA<BR>

 North110: Give us those dream submissions!GA<BR>

 Writes4kdz: I have it Michele!<BR>

 Writes4kdz: : )<BR>

 WriterBabe: Thank you both for being such truly wonderful guests!<BR>

 MaryCronk: Thanks so much, Michele & Julie!  Really appreciate you being<BR>

 here<BR>

 North110: Anytime<BR>

 BOEDEN: Excellent workshop! Marilyn, terrific questions. You have the knack.<BR>

 <BR>

 WriterBabe: A huge round of applause, folks!<BR>

 TEs angel: Thank you, Michele and Julie!  Good luck with your wedding<BR>

 plans... Thanks, Marilyn!<BR>

 Pete n Gun: Thanks Michele and Julie.  Thanks Marilyn, Chuck, Donna, Sue,<BR>

 and others. Great guests.<BR>

 BOEDEN: Wonderful direct answers Guests. THANK YOU!<BR>

 CarolynB34: thanks so much -- great chat!<BR>

 WriterBabe: ;-) Sue<BR>

 LindaRyter: Thanks!<BR>

 BOEDEN: Thanks Workshop crew, Donna Chuck. Happy writing all.  Nighty night.<BR>

 Lizbooks: Thanks!  You were both super!<BR>

 MJAlso: Thanks, Michelle and Julie.  Great chat!<BR>

 RPYaman: Thanks Julie and Michele.  Great workshop!<BR>

 BOEDEN: Ü<BR>

 Julisari: Thank you Julie and Michele!!!!!!!!!<BR>

 Writes4kdz: Whoop Whoop!   Thank you.  <BR>

 Neely f: ()()()()()()( Clapping )()()()()()<BR>

 Jgregers: Hi Sue!<BR>

  >><BR>

</HTML>


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BOTTOM LIVE script

Evidence supporting quantum information processing in animals

ARMIES OF CHAOS