The UFO "Conspiracy" - The Final Word.

 Path: ns-mx!iowasp.physics.uiowa.edu!ceres.physics.uiowa.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!hsdndev!rice!uw-beaver!milton!tvex

From: tvex@milton.u.washington.edu (t@vex)

Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy

Subject: Re: The UFO "Conspiracy" - The Final Word.

Message-ID: <1991Apr15.020548.18365@milton.u.washington.edu>

Date: 15 Apr 91 02:05:48 GMT

References: <DPqD11w164w@arkham.wimsey.bc.ca>

Sender: t@vex

Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

Lines: 39

In article <DPqD11w164w@arkham.wimsey.bc.ca> jaguar@arkham.wimsey.bc.ca (Jeremy Reimer) writes: (text deleted)

>        e) And, get this, they tie in the JFK assasination conspiracy theory

>           (what a bonus) by saying JFK wanted to "expose" the UFO

>           coverup, and was therefore disposed of by his own officials.

>

>Now look, speculations about extraterrestrial life are fine.  Debating whether

>or not they could have landed here some time in the past, well, OK.  But this

>is ridiculous.  NO government could have possible covered up such a story

>for over four decades (they can't even keep a simple sex scandal undercover, I

>mean, really)

From the tone of your post, I gathered that you felt personally threatened by

Cooper's position. I was curious that you bothered to read the material at all;

after all, it fills at least a solid half-hour--and that's just for starters.

Everyone knows that John Lear is a phony (and some of our Neo-Nazi brethren and

sistren who also hold opinions about the nature of the UFO phenomenon have

suggested that he is a pawn of ZOG). Why not Bill Cooper as well? And if the

entire question is as absurd as you seem to want it to be, why did you bother

posting to the internet? Ethnography can sometimes be a humorous pursuit--no

-one says you have to discover god in every piece of the written record. I

personally feel that Original Hostage Krll would laugh at your some of your

suggestions (if there was ever such an entity and if said entity was ever

capable of laughter). I was amused by your mention of the JFK biz: JFK has

served as supporting evidence for more conspiracy theories than I can count.

And what if the unsuccessful coverups of lame-o sex scandals were being used

by the bad guys to give our stellar media services grist and take some of the

heat (if not all of it) away from areas that were a little too close to home?

Do you remember the incident that made front-page news @ TASS two years ago? I

didn't think so.

This is no flame, really. And it is certainly not meant in that kind of way at

all. I simply find it humorous that you mention "Scientific Debate", JFK, Cooper

and numerous other interesting tidbits in the same small post.

appreciatively, t@vex

________________________________________________________________________________from low on the banks of elliot bay we sit and await the coming of evening.

________________________________________________________________________________