THE HYNEK RATING SYSTEM

 THE HYNEK RATING SYSTEM

-----------------------

At the bottom of each UFO Sighting Report in the CUFON database you will see 

a rating in the form S#/P#. This represents ParaNet's initial Hynek Rating of 

the value of the case. It is not to be confused with the Classification, whic

h is simply a representation of the type of case being dealt with. ParaNet ha

s devised what we call  "the  Hynek Scale"  or  "the  Hynek Rating  System"  

in hopes of creating a standard by which to judge UFO reports. The system is 

explained below.


S:  Strangeness 

The  "Strangeness" factor of a  case description shall  be rated

 from 1 to 5 as follows: .


    1 - Explained or Explainable

    2 - Probably Explainable, with more data

    3 - Possibly Explainable, but with elements of strangeness

    4 - Strange; Does not conform with known principles

    5 - Highly Strange; Definitely indicative of intelligent guidance

.

Examples:

    S1 - Aircraft, meteor, etc.

    S2 - Experimental aircraft; planet or star

    S3 - Slow, low flying objects in formation

    S4 - BOL (Ball of Light Phenomena); physical traces

    S5 - Close Encounters, Abductions, etc.


P: Probability The "Probability" factor of a case relates to the credibility,

 number  and  separation  of  witnesses  and/or  the  soundness  of  evidence

 gathered.  It shall be rated from 1 to 5 as follows: .


    1 - Not Credible or Sound

    2 - Unreliable; Smacks of Hoax

    3 - Somewhat credible or indeterminate

    4 - Credible; Sound

    5 - Highly Credible, leaving almost no doubt


Examples:

    P1 - Known Hoaxer or UFO "Flake"; Hoax Photo

    P2 - Repeat Witness; Conflicting Testimony

    P3 - Standard, first-time witness; slight radiation reading

    P4 - Multiple witnesses; pilot; clear photo

    P5 - National Figure; Multiple independent witnesses; videotape


The composite  Hynek Rating of  a case shall  consist of  the combined S  & P

 factors, stated as Sn/Pn, e.g.  S3/P5; except that cases with an S factor of

 1 shall simply be stated as S1.



Examples using recent or famous cases:


    S1 - Wickenburg, AZ, July 10 (explanation:Mars)

    S5/P1 - Billy Meier

    S2/P5 - X-shaped UFO, Petaluma, CA  May 28

    S4/P5 - Brazilian "Ping Pong Balls"

    S5/P4 - Betty & Barney Hill

    S4/P4 - Lubbock Lights

    S5/P5 - MedEvac Helicopter ("Coyne" Case)

    S3/P2 - Delphos

    S4/P2 - Anything published in SAUCER SMEAR


I believe this rating system will be  a useful tool to investigators who wish

 to narrow their focus  to the most promising cases.  It  is not my intention

 that any one group  "stake a claim" to this system; rather,  I'd like to see

 several groups  or investigators  rate cases  according to  their own  view,

 merely using this system as a standard.   .  The rating of a particular case

 may, indeed  perhaps should,  change from time  to time  as new  evidence is

 gathered.  


Your comments are welcome.  


Jim Speiser



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BOTTOM LIVE script

                                  BOTTOM                                   ======                     by Adrian Edmondson and Rik Mayall                                 Bottom Live                                 ===========                               Richie  Rik Mayall                                Eddie  Adrian Edmondson Introduction ------------ [Opening shot of theatre, with huge pictures of Richie and Eddie. Caption: "Live fro...
Read more

Evidence supporting quantum information processing in animals

              Evidence supporting quantum            information processing in animals                    James A. Donald                    1068 Fulton Av                    Sunnyvale, CA 94089-1505                    USA I show that quantum systems can rapidly solve some problems for which finite state machines require a non- polynomially large time. This class of problems is closely related to the class of problems that animals can solve rapidly and effortlessly, but are intractable for computers by all known algorithms. 1. Introduction      Animals, including very simple animals, can rapidly and effortlessly perceive objects, whereas computers take nonpolynomial time to do this by all...
Read more

ARMIES OF CHAOS

                          ARMIES OF CHAOS -      Before anyone proposes more gun control, he or she should know  about a simple, deadly weapon 4 times as powerful as Dirty Harry's  legendary .44 Magnum -- and at least twice as concealable -- that  _can't_ controlled.        This simple, deadly weapon can be made by anyone -- even a  child -- with unpowered hand tools in an hour's time using $5 worth  of materials, most of which are available around the house anyway.   In traditional form it's reusable an unlimited number of times, and  modern plastics have rendered its disposable version electronically  undetectable.  You can clear a room with such a weapon (more of a  hand-held directional grenade than a gun -- sort of a recycleable  Claymore mine) and it's just one of hundreds of similar time-proven  designs. ...
Read more