MAN: The Human Receiver
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
May 15, 1992
HUMAN.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Mike Peraaho.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
MAN: The Human Receiver
This article appeared in Monitoring Times, March, 1991 issue.
by Bob Grove
Two types of radiation, ionizing and non-ionizing, pervade our
planet. Ionizing radiation is produced by nuclear energy
radioactivity as unleashed by nuclear explosions and power plant
accidents. It is also present in nature as attested to by the
continuing concerns about radon gas in our homes.
Non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIEMR) is more insidious
everywhere we look in our electric world we see its evidence in our
homes, offices, vehicles and even on the open road.
The suspicion that radio waves and other forms of electromagnetic
(EM) pollution may be harmful has been with us for decades. Early
radar experiments cooked the experimenters; now scientists suspect
that weaker energy fields like those produced by electric power
lines may have delayed effects.
- Some Alarming Statistics -
Dr. Genevieve Matanoski of Johns Hopkins University claims that
there is a disturbing link between human cancer and exposure to
power lines. She cites the high level of cancer among telephone
linemen and breast cancer among male repairmen working on central
office switching equipment.
Data collected by the University of North Carolina suggest that
pregnant women who use electric blankets are 70% more likely to
induce leukemia and 130% more likely to induce brain cancer into
their unborn children.
Young children using electric blankets seem to have a 50% higher
cancer rate and 90% higher leukemia incidence than non-electric-
blanket users.
Even electrically-heated water beds are suspect. Fortunately, the
actual numbers of these cases are small.
Page 1
So what is the governmentÕs official stance on the NIEMR question?
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a statement in June
1990 in which they observed that Òthere is a small but statistically
significant correlation between electromagnetic fields and cancer.
It is the magnetic, not electric, component of the fields that the
EPA holds suspect.
White House Science Advisor D. Allan Bromley and Assistant Secretary
of Health James Mason withheld from the public for six months,
ostensibly to prevent alarm, a portion of the report which concluded
that there is a consistent pattern of response which suggests a
causal link between electric power line radiation and leukemia,
brain cancer and lymphoma among children. A summary of the EPA
study was finally released in full in mid-December 1990.
Not unexpected, the U.S. Air Force, with its extensive deployment of
video terminals and other electronics, blasted the report and EPA,
saying that Air Force reviewers have never found any evidence of a
link between electromagnetic fields and cancer. Further, they
charged that the EPA biased the entire document to establish such a
link.
We know very little about the hazards of electromagnetic radiation
because of its recency, but when unexplained trash fires erupt
spontaneously near power lines in Honolulu, or the incidence of
Downs Syndrome (Mongolism) is unusually high in Vernon, New Jersey,
the site of an enormous satellite transmitting complex, there is
cause for concern.
Paul Brodeur, author of the books, Currents of Death and The Zapping
of America (both published by Simon and Schuster), accuses the White
House of suppression and politicization of a major health issue.
In the July 9, 1990, issue of the New Yorker, Brodeur reports
increased cases of miscarriages, brain tumors, birth defects and
cancers among residents near power lines. Some experts disagree
with Brodeur whom they see as an alarmist fanning the flames of the
popular press.
Most researchers do seem to agree, however, that long-term, nearby
exposures are more hazardous that short-term, distant exposures, and
that simply restringing power line cables so that they are close
together dramatically reduces their radiation. With this
information now public, what are the legal ramifications for power
companies who have done nothing to correct the problem?
The hazards of computer video display terminals have been well
publicized, but how are they different from TV screens? They're
not. But computer operators sit right in front of their screens,
and only terminal couch potatoes get that close to their vidiot
boxes! The lesson is to sit at least an arm's length away from the
screen to significantly reduce the radiation hazard.
The December 1990 issue of the American Journal of Industrial
Medicine reports a sharp increase in brain cancer cases over the
last few years. There are concerns as well about antenna radiation
from walkie-talkies, ham and CB radios, broadcasting transmitters,
and cellular and cordless telephones. While some of these
technologies may be relatively new, critics claim that the
Page 2
government is purposely avoiding such studies, afraid of the
political consequences of revealing the truth.
In a faltering economy, homeowners near power lines are doubly hurt,
finding their property values plummeting. Power companies could
face lawsuits for maintaining wide-spaced, overhead power lines when
they are aware that close spacing and underground placement
dramatically reduce electromagnetic exposure. Obviously, homes,
playgrounds and schools should not be close to high tension lines.
Other industries as well face staggering lawsuits brought by
employees who feel that their disabilities were caused by electric
and electronic equipment to which they were exposed. Computer
operators should stay at least 30 inches from their screens (and 36
inches from the sides and back).
Like other forms of pollution, the cost to clean up the
electromagnetic environment would filter down to the consumer who is
already burdened by high taxes and economic recession.
- A generation of experimentationÉ -
In the early 1970s, Dr. Ross Adey discovered that low-level 16 Hz
radiation would alter the flow of calcium ions in the brain; the
U.S. Navy pulses their 420 MHz long-distance radar bursts at 18.5
Hz, well within the calcium window.
Dan Lyle, an associate of Adey's, discovered that a 60-Hz-modulated
450 MHz signal could alter the immune system. In England, Richard
Dixey and Glen Rein showed that pulsed 600 Hz fields affect the
body's neurotransmitters. What effect does the Navy's Project ELF
76 Hz transmitters have?
EM experiments with humans were reported long ago: 6.6 Hz caused
depression, 11 Hz caused agitation and riotous behavior, 8 Hz
produced elated feelings, and frequencies below 6.26 Hz induced
confusion and anxiety. What are the consequences of the global 10
Hz radio pulses from the Russian woodpecker?
Red, green and blue color perception may be enhanced by placing
electrodes on the subject's temples and introducing 42.5 and 77 Hz
voltages.
Robert Becker, in his recent book, The Body Electric
Electromagnetism and the Foundations of Life, states that 30-100 Hz
electric fields, weaker than even the earth's natural magnetic
field, interfere with the body's cycles and rhythms, producing
chronic stress and impairment disease.
The human bodyÕs nervous-system works on very minute pulses of
electrical energy, typically a few millionths of a volt. The heart
depolarizes, producing a beat, in only a quarter second. It doesn't
take much induced EM to interfere with those tiny signal levels.
Currents as low as 10 milliamperes produce pain, while those in the
100-200 milliampere ranges are lethal.
Our earth is constantly bathed in waves of electromagnetic energy
from the sun, the planets and even more distant heavenly bodies.
Page 3
How do these emanations influence our daily lives? What are their
long term effects?
30 years ago Charles Susskind at the University of California, under
a U.S. Air Force grant, demonstrated that 3-cm radar transmissions
killed laboratory mice in front of a radar horn when their body
temperature exceeded 111 degrees (your tax dollars inventing the
microwave oven!). In 1962 Susskind and his assistant, Susan
Prausnitz, published their daring conclusion that pulsed microwaves
could cause leukemia.
In another experiment, ants lined up in a 3-cm EM field, aligning
their antennae parallel to the field in an effort to minimize the
effect. Not surprising, since the antenna of an ant is very nearly
a quarter wave resonator at 3 cm. The ant-alignment behavior was
observed at frequencies as low as 9 MHz.
It was during that period that a report from the National Institute
for Neurological Diseases warned that the frequency 388 MHz was
noted to have a lethal effect on monkeys. Subsequent experiments
with a milliwatt-power oscillator positioned several feet away from
human subjects and swept through the 380-500 MHz range elicited a
Òpulsing in the brain, ringing in the ears and a powerful urge to
sink their teeth into the experimenter!
In that experiment, each individual appeared to have his own
resonant frequency, probably a function of the height of the body
acting as a half-wave antenna. Most humans should resonate at
around 82-85 MHz (TV channel 6; do you live near a TV transmitter?).
Extremely low frequency brain waves have long been identified; delta
(1-3 Hz) are related to deep sleep; theta (4-7 Hz) reflect mood;
alpha (8-12 Hz) imply relaxation; and beta (13-22 Hz) are tied to
conscious thought.
Externally-pulsed lights can alter behavior in the human: 6-7 Hz
induces anger; 10 Hz is soothing but may trigger epileptic seizures
in vulnerable subjects by synchronizing with the alpha waves. And
there is the story about a man who involuntarily tries to strangle
an adjacent patron every time he visits a movie house, triggered by
the 24-frame-per-second film flicker!
Animals have their own sets of frequencies. Some snakes hypnotize
their prey with a 3 Hz dance; many animals flea in terror when they
hear vibrations in the 7-15 Hz range, possibly a primordial reaction
to earthquakes. Infrasound (under 20 Hz) can take its toll in human
adjustment as well, producing disorientation and even euphoria.
Professor Geraud, a French engineer, became ill from the continuous
7 Hz vibration of an office air conditioner. Noting that the sound
generated by French police whistles had low frequency components, he
built a six-foot, air-powered replica which killed his laboratory
assistant with one blast!
Later experiments showed that high-intensity infrasound could
destroy buildings at distances of five miles. Pulsing rock music
mesmerize its audience while the soft 1.2 Hz beat of a motherÕs
heart soothes her baby.
Page 4
By 1930 Nrunori claimed that humans react to radio emissions at 129
MHz and its harmonics, while in the 1920's Cazzamalli bombarded
volunteer subjects with VHF radiation to induce hallucinations. He
also claimed to have recorded re-radiated beats of emotional
reactions using an untuned galena crystal receiver and a
galvanometer during the RF blitz from his oscillatori telegrafica.
More recently, UHF fields reportedly change brainwave patterns in
rabbits, alter the heartbeat of chicken embryos, change the optical
properties of glycogen (which supplies our muscles with energy),
reduce conditioned reflexes in laboratory animals, increase visual
sensitivity (while reducing color perception), expedite the regrowth
of severed nerve tissue (in short exposures only; long-term exposure
suppresses the regrowth), and affect our reaction to pain (weak
fields are an analgesic while strong fields are painful). Fifteen-
meter (21 MHz) signals increase the germination of gladiolus bulbs
while ten meter (29 MHz) energy kills bugs in bread!
- And experimentation on a generation -
The earth's natural magnetic field varies from place to place; could
it have correspondingly varying effects on the human body as well as
variably alter the effects of radiation?
One hypothesis suggests that NIEMR causes cancer by increasing the
rate of cell reproduction (DNA and RNA alteration), by suppressing
the immune system and by making abnormal cells resistant to the
body's natural defense system.
Could it be that pulsed EM waves are the modern-day equivalent of
the Chinese water torture, taking its toll on human mental health a
little at a time? Could this partly explain our accelerating crime
rate? Are we changing our evolution by altering our genetic
structure?
Perhaps most important of all, can we do anything to protect
ourselves? Absolutely. Don't live near high tension lines. Use
underground power lines to your home and have them enter at an
unoccupied part of the dwelling like the garage.
Keep at least an armÕs length from CRT video screens. Install ham
or CB transmitting antennas at least 20 feet away from occupied
parts of the house. The higher the frequency, the greater the
effect on tissue, especially the lens of the eye and the testicles.
Use low transmit power linears are for sissies! Keep walkie-talkie
transmissions short; portable cellular telephones at 800 MHz are
particularly suspect. Warm your bed with an electric blanket before
you get in, then switch it off when you slip under it.
Keep several feet away from electric appliances Ñ line operated
clocks, mixers, toasters and the like.
- Activism -
Suits against the perpetrators of this uninvited blitz of toxicity
will probably increase. Charges of negligence, liability, nuisance,
trespass and even battery have been successfully brought recently in
Page 5
similar cases. Join a recognized consumer lobby group. A collected
voice IS heard in Washington!
For those readers who wish additional information, an excellent
overview of NIEMR health hazard studies and legal cases, complete
with bibliography, appeared in the August 1990, issue of Trial
magazine, a publication of the American Trial Lawyers Association.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 6
Comments
Post a Comment