Discourse on the likelihood of inventing a "Time Machine"
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
June 24, 1991
TIME1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is brief essay on some thoughts I've had about
travelling through time. I would be interested in anyone's comments
about the possibility. I may be reached at
Steve Sousa
171 Kingston Road
Exeter, NH 03833
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Discourse on the likelihood of inventing a "Time Machine"
Common in science fiction literature is the concept of an invention
that would propel the user forward or backward in time. Though very
appealing in print, it would seem to violate at least one law of
physics and to necessitate, besides the device to transcend time, a
second device that would allow symultaneous movement through space.
What I would like to do in this short essay, is describe some of the
difficulties time travel presents.
The first difficulty I see is one of human recorded history. If we
were to assume that at sometime in the future a device to move
through time is to be invented, and that it will be used, then why
has not history ever recorded the arrival of a time traveller?
Given the capability to travel to far off times, what would the time
traveller's motive be? To only observe events and people would, in
my opinion, be very a aloof thing to do. Given the ability to talk
with people of past times, it would be irresistible not to.
Why would a time traveller want to travel through time? We all
could make lists of people we would like to speak with or of events
we would like to see. But, to my knowledge, there is no recorded
instance of a traveller appearing who talked of moving through time
and left behind knowledge of the future.
But this "negative evidence" is not conclusive. There may be
physical principles at work which would prevent the traveller from
interacting with others. These physical principles would prevent
the traveller from ever leaving in the first place.
Every upper elementary student, while studying science, has run
across the laws of conservation of matter and energy. Each law
states that matter or energy cannot be created nor destroyed only
Page 1
changed into a different form.
Matter is defined as anything that takes up space and has mass.
Matter can be thought of as "the stuff" of existence. Matter is
made up of tiny particles called atoms. There are about 106 known
different types of atoms.
The stuff that makes up you or me or anything else in the universe
is discrete and individual, that is, it cannot be in two places at
the same time nor can two different atoms occupy the same space.
Now, if time travel were possible, could the following ever happen:
The time machine is to be tested with a mouse to ensure it
will be safe for human use. The mouse is placed in the
device and it is sent five minutes into the future. The
machine disappears and five minutes later the machine and
mouse appear. So far so good.
It is now sent five minutes into the past. Here the first
problem appears. Five minutes before you sent the mouse off
to the past you did not notice a second mouse appear
securely strapped in a second time machine. The researcher
did not see the mouse appear before it has left.
Even if the mouse did appear, there would be two mice, each
composed of the same atoms. Again, the same matter cannot
be in two places at the same time.
The atoms that make up the time traveller and his machine were
continuously recycled through past time. The atoms in my fingers
and toes and everywhere in between were used by other organisms in
other times or were locked up in the rocks, water, and air of the
earth. If I were to travel back in time, my atoms would already be
in use somewhere else. How could I exist then at that time?
A second problem to be faced with a working time machine is one that
involves the addition of movement through space.
Matter in the universe takes up space, that is, it has length,
width, and depth. These are the three dimensions all matter
possess. There is also a fourth dimension. The dimension of time.
All matter exists in space and moves through time. You move through
space as you go through the day. The earth and the rest of the
planets and their moons, moves through space as they circle the sun.
The sun moves through space as it moves with the rest of the galaxy
around the galactic center and, as you can imagine, the galaxy is
moving through the universe. All this movement is happening
simultaneously, but we are not aware of it (thank goodness, for
those of us who suffer from motion sickness.).
The computation of all this relative movement is crucial for the
successful rendezvous of satellites with the planets and moons they
are to observe.
The earth and other planets DO NOT RETURN to the same spaces as they
orbit the sun. All matter in the universe, when you compute these
Page 1
motions, are SPIRALING THROUGH SPACE. The orbits are not neat
ellipses.
To get back to our time traveller, as he moves back in time, the
earth, sun, and galaxy have all moved relative to each other. The
traveller would most probably find himself out in space somewhere
rather than watching the signing of the Declaration of Independence
or being there for Superbowl I.
The time machine would need some way of computing where the earth
would be for any date in history and a means of getting there.
All this is fun to speculate upon. Though I reckon that time travel
is not possible, I'm not 100% certain. I still hold out that at
some-time in the future the problems mentioned here will be
clarified.
Someday there might be a battered old blue police box like Dr. Who's
TARDIS, his Time And Relative Dimension in Space machine. The
Doctor recognized the difficulties of movement through space and
time, but only in story can he transport us to any point in the
universe at any point in time. Until then, I can only wait out time
and carry myself through space.
Wait a minute, what am I doing sitting over there, laughing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Notes...
In regard to the very outdated concept that atoms are "recycled"
throughout the Universe, evidence, indeed, rational thought
refutes the idea. Matter is converted back into energy and the
energy is again converted into mass on a continual basis.
As time progresses, ALL THINGS CHANGE, including the
morphogenetic fields which organize all matter in its
characteristic and uniquely individual form. Keely refers to
this process by the analogy of stamping out 1,000 coins from the
same press.
Each coin will be slightly different due to the infinite
possibilities offered by the variations in the consistency of
the metal in each coin, slight variations in the pressure of the
press for each coin, dents, etc which can further affect the
"signature" of each coin. Not to mention the influences of
other waves ranging from sound to light to cosmic influences
even unto planetary bodies of the system.
Indeed, Keely says that simply touching the coin will alter the
"signature" of the coin. The entire concept of Sympathy as
opposed to Resonance can be equated to "fine tuning" or "coarse
tuning". By this definition, Sympathy tunes to the entire
"signature" over a wide range of frequencies and phase
relationships, while Resonance tunes to the fundamental
frequency of the mass without regard for the many subtle
harmonics.
The magic in the phenomena generated by Keely was due to this
understanding which allowed him to build ever more sensitive
mechanisms for the analysis and tuning to such complex
waveforms.
Page 3
Back to Time Travel, Keely states quite matter-of-factly that
"TIME IS GRAVITY". He says that the flow of "gravity" into the
neutral center of a mass determines the degree of time to which
the mass will be affected.
Note that the ruling flows will be those of the greatest mass,
in other words, the Earth dictates the primary time flow for us
with our mass densities presenting the secondary time flows.
As to the movement of bodies through space, there is indication
that the Aether drift of the Earth would sustain a time
travelling body in such a manner that it would not leave the
energy domain of the ruling mass in which it resides.
Here Aether is seen as the flow of force into the neutral center
of all masses which serves to aggregate and sustain the
existence of the mass in the physical form. Refer to NEUTRAL1
for a better understanding of one of Keely's greatest
discoveries.
High intensity magnetic (or other) fields appear capable of
altering the flow of Aether into the Neutral centers of mass
which therefore alters time to some degree. At this point in
time, there is almost no written literature on this subject nor
many reports beyond the Philadelphia Experiment which indicate
the dangers or possibilities of such an experiment.
We have found in the UFO literature some fascinating indications
that AGING DOES NOT OCCUR or is greatly attenuated for living
organisms immersed in an inertial dampening field which comes
with the territory of anti-gravity. Alleged interviews with
aliens frequently report a physique indicative of a 20 to 35
year old, yet the being claims to be in excess of 1000 of "our
Earth (note this) years".
Further questions on this matter directed towards the beings
lead to the statement that the aging process is greatly slowed
WHILE IN THE PRESENCE OF THE SHIP FIELD and that movement
outside this field will subject their bodies to the aging
effects of the planetary body in dominion. Look in the UFO
section and the BIOLOGY section for further details, particularly
DNAMAST2.
We welcome comments on the above subjects as we find definite
correlations from many diverse (and to some, fantastic) sources.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
Comments
Post a Comment