connections between U.S. military base closings and the "New World Order"

 Today's "trivia" questions are......

"What are the *actual* connections between U.S. military base 

closings and the "New World Order", with its accompanying "New 

World Police Force"? Why are a number of these bases, currently 

slated to be closed for U.S. military use, currently undergoing 

expensive renovations and additions?" 

You can check the following item out very quickly at the 

Library of Congress, or at any large metropolitan reference 

library, and I can promise you that it won't be time wasted!

Ask for a copy of VOLUME 9 of the 1982 EDITION [*not* the 

current, replacement edition] of the U.S. CODE. Turn to page 

554, where you'll find the beginning of PUBLIC LAW # 87-297 

[1961]. This law was signed by President Kennedy in 1962, 

has received 18 subsequent updates, and its provisions have 

been steadily implemented by every President since. IT CALLS 

FOR THE ELIMINATION OF THE U.S. NATIONAL ARMED FORCES and 

further declares that "NO ONE MAY POSSESS A FIREARM OR LETHAL 

WEAPON EXCEPT POLICE AND MILITARY PERSONNEL". The progressive 

steps in its implementation are:

 

 1. the reduction of the U.S. Armed Forces to 2.1 million 

    personnel.

 2. their irrevokable merger with Russian and Chinese forces, 

    in two stages, to form a World Army [50% of total U.S. 

    force strength will be merged in the first stage; the 

    remaining 50% in the second stage]. 

 3. the irrevokable surrender of authority over such forces 

    to the U.N. Secretary-General [ who alrady has a military 

    planning staff of 80 general officers].

 4. the confiscation of all privately-held firearms.

 

This law is taught and explained in the National War College, 

and the various U.S. Armed Forces Academies. The New World Order 

will require an Army: this is it, and presumably the U.S. itself 

could then find itself policed by foreign troops under the U.N. 

flag. By agreement, THE COMMANDER OF THIS ARMY MUST ALWAYS BE A 

RUSSIAN!

The relevant pages and sections are: page 554; page 555 [lower 

right-hand side of page: defines "disarmament" as elimination 

of U.S. Forces and calls for absolute restrictions on 

privately-owned "deadly weapons"]; page 557, sections [a] and 

[d] [again, require U.S. to eliminate its Armed Forces]; page 

558 deals with "policy formulation" [i.e. the accomplishment of 

these goals]. George Bush said that the passing of authority 

to the Secretary-General was "in transition"; the Supreme Court 

has already ruled that the U.S. Constitution and its provisions 

stand UNDER the U.N. Charter and the Resolutions of the United 

Nations. The U.S. Armed Forces are acting as the U.N.'s "world 

policeman" in the interim.

The provisions of this law are further explained in STATE 

DEPARTMENT PUBLICATION 72-77, which itself is published in 

unabridged form in the 35-page "BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE RACE", 

published by U.S. ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY

[PUBLICATION #4, GENERAL SERIES #3, MAY 1962]. I'm sure you find 

this hard to believe, but it's all there in black and white; 

read it for yourself! The implications are staggering but the 

multiple military base closings around the U.S take on a new 

perspective when you see the agenda which that law commits 

the U.S. government to follow! Another small tip is that new 

issues of uniforms [e.g. the new Air Force uniform] reportedly 

have no "U.S."insignia. 

Please do go and read these documents for yourself. It's 

astonishing, but it's exactly as I've described it to you. 

NAFTA is a small but vital part of something *much* bigger!

                                                                                    

Don't be misled by the wording of "Policy Formulation" on page 

558 in volume 9, U.S. CODE, 1982. It was re-written in 1963 to 

pacify objectors, and forbids removal of firearms from the 

populace or reduction in national armed strength "UNLESS IT IS 

PURSUANT TO THE TREATY-MAKING POWER OF THE PRESIDENT OR

AUTHORISED BY LEGISLATION OF THE CONGRESS"! The U.N Charter is 

regarded as an already-binding treaty, so all that is required 

is a U.N. Resolution or Congressional legislation to ban all 

"citizen" armaments. George Bush's father, Preston, helped push 

this law [87-297] through Congress. One of the experts

on it is ex-State Senator Bernadine Smith [Box 1776, HANFORD, 

CALIFORNIA 93232], who resisted it bitterly, and knows its 

contents and intent as well as anybody. Or you could just call 

the National War College and ask innocently for more information 

on it!

                                                    

Two interesting footnotes on PUBLIC LAW 87-297 {1961}: 

 * 200 members of the Trilateral Commission had a late-March 

   meeting over several days in Washington, at which they 

   discussed and agreed on the need for [guess what?] A NEW 

   WORLD ARMY and for U.N. SOVEREIGN CONTROL OF INDIVIDUAL 

   STATES' IMMIGRATION POLICIES AND DECISIONS. On the evening 

   of the 28th of March, their representatives dined with key 

   U.S. government officials and presented these

   "recommendations", and then did the same thing over 

   breakfast the next morning with Clinton. So here it comes!  

   This will lead ultimately to an enormous concentration of 

   power in very few hands. 

  

 * AFT, as the "compliance and enforcement" arm of the Treasury 

   Department [which has a CFR man heading it], has been 

   unlawfully "compelling" gunshop owners across the U.S. to 

   provide the names, addresses and zip codes of all "long gun" 

   [rifle and shotgun] purchasers, when no legal requirement 

   exists for this. They are apparently creating a computerised 

   registry of ALL private weapons across the United States, 

   by locality, street and house. REMEMBER THE CONFISCATION 

   REQUIREMENT FOR ALL PRIVATE WEAPONS EMBODIED IN "A 

   BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE RACE" AND IN STATE DEPARTMENT 

   PUBLICATION # 72-77? 

 

THIS LAW IS STILL IN THE *CURRENT* EDITION OF THE U.S. CODE,

ALTHOUGH THE PAGE NUMBERS HAVE BEEN CHANGED. YOU CAN FIND      

IT FAIRLY EASILY BY CHECKING THE INDEX TO THE U.S.CODE.

                    

                      - o O o -

So you think that this is fanciful? Read this news item, 

which appeared earlier this year.....

                                          

RUSSIAN-AMERICAN DEFENCE AGREEMENT CALLS FOR JOINT

MANEUVERS

WASHINGTON: The United States and Russia signed an agreement

Wednesday on military cooperation that provides for joint 

military maneuvers by the two former Cold War foes.

    The Russian Defense Minister, General of the Army Pavel 

Grachev, who is visiting Washington, signed the memorandum of 

understanding with Defense Secretary Les Aspin at a Pentagon 

ceremony.

    The agreement calls for the two sides to hold joint 

maneuvers that practice peacekeeping techniques.

    The agreement also calls for annual meetings between 

Grachev and Aspin and their successors, exchanges between the 

chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and his Russian 

counterpart and a bilateral defense working group to formulate 

projects of Russian-American defense.

    "This ceremony demonstrates again that the relationship 

between our two countries is undergoing historic 

transformation," Aspin said.

    "As President Clinton and President Yeltsin said at their 

Vancouver summit meeting," he said, "we are establishing a 

strategic partnership," Aspin said. "It is a partnership in 

which military and defense relations play a leading role."

    "Russia places its highest priority on its cooperation 

with the United States," Grachev said, "We promise to do all 

in our power...to realize this agreement."

    The Russian-American ground maneuvers will train the two 

sides in peacekeeping techniques. The first units to 

participate will be the U.S. 3rd Mechanized Infantry Division 

and the Russian 27th Motorized Rifle.

    Both division commanders, U.S. Maj. Gen. Leonard Holder, Jr. 

and Russian Maj. Gen. Anatoliy Sidyakin, were on hand for the 

Pentagon ceremony.

    "Our two commanders, right after the signing of this 

agreement, will sit down at a table and start working out a 

whole series of steps to make this all happen," Grachev said.

    Both Grachev and Aspin said they wanted to establish a 

"hotline" between their respective defense establishments 

although provision for that was not actually in the agreement 

they signed.

    In addition to joint peacekeeping exercises, the 

memorandum calls for annual meetings between Aspin and Grachev 

and their successors, exchanges between the chairman of the U.S. 

Joint Chiefs of Staff and his Russian counterpart and a 

bilateral working group to think up more projects for 

Russian-American military cooperation.

    No date or place for the first joint Russian-American ground 

maneuver has yet been set.

    Pressed on whether the exercise would be held this year, 

Grachev noted that the planning time needed for maneuvers of so 

large a scale would mean that if so, it would probably have to 

start during the [?]

    "The 3rd Division commander," he joked, "said if it's OK 

with them, we can go to Siberia and hold them there."

                     

                      - o O o -

    

Interested in learning more? Download NWO_NO!.TXT from this BBS

[or from CRS Online, Toronto], for more background information

and an excellent reading list.

     PLEASE RE-POST THIS FILE WIDELY TO OTHER BBS SYSTEMS!