Mars: A Future Home for Humanity chapter three
MARS NEEDS HUMANS
(c) Robert Zubrin & Chris McKay
The purpose for sending humans to Mars is not to set altitude
records for the aviation almanacs. Rather it is to resolve
some of the most important questions concerning the role of
life in the universe. Evidence available from the Mariner and
Viking orbiters, including photographs of dry riverbeds,
strongly indicate that Mars was once a warm and wet planet,
and was so for a longer period of time than the several
hundred millions years it took life to originate on Earth.
Today Mars is cold and arid, with a surface environment
hostile to terrestrial life forms. Nevertheless the question
remains: since conditions on Earth and Mars were similar
during the period that life originated on Earth, did life
also evolve on Mars?
The answer to this question is fundamental to understanding
humanities place in the Universe. If we find evidence of life
on Mars, however humble or long extinct, it would tell us the
origin of life on Earth was not a result of freak chance.
Instead, it would confirm our present speculations that life
is a natural and emergent phenomenon of energy-rich, liquid
water environments. It would imply that elsewhere in the
galaxy there must almost certainly be a spectacular variety
of other planets with liquid water and with life, and that
the universe we inhabit is filled with living things whose
diversity must surpass imagination. We would know we are not
alone.
The discovery of actual living organisms on Mars could be
epochal in a practical sense as well. To date, we have had
only terrestrial life forms to study, all possibly
descendants of a common line, so that our understanding of
biology is quite limited. Our position is like that of a
person who is trying to understand the nature of language,
but who is only acquainted with his or her mother tongue.
Comparing Martian life forms with terrestrial ones would
allow us to begin to determine which features of life on
Earth are incidental and which are fundamental to the true
nature of life itself. Such knowledge could lead to
astounding breakthroughs in the biological sciences and
medicine, resulting in dramatic improvements in the human
condition.
The search for evidence of life on Mars will not be an easy
task. Consider how difficult it is to find fossils on Earth
of such common megafauna as dinosaurs. Its going to be a lot
harder to find fossils of microorganisms tend to be
considerably smaller than dinosaurs and leave fossils that
are much less obvious. For another, the Martian fossils are
likely to be much older, and therefore rarer. Since the
Martian environment is nowhere near as well understood as
that of the Earth, the processes likely to lead to
preservation are less well known. This will make it harder to
locate sites where fossils would be preserved and more
difficult to understand the unusual settings that resulted in
preservation.
On Earth the only way we know how to conduct such searches is
with trained field scientists. Trained not only with
classroom knowledge but with hands-on field experience, often
over many years. While robotic probes operating from orbit or
dispersed landing sites can provide essential preliminary
data, they are simply incapable of conducting this type of
exploration of Mars. Consider the probability of success of a
program searching for dinosaur fossils on Earth conducted by
random parachuting down small packages of instruments. The
result would likely be nil. The same can be said with even
greater certitude of a purely robotic search for the remains
of life on Mars. If we want to solve the mystery of Mars'
past or present life, trained field scientists working on the
planet's surface for many years will be necessary to do the
job.
In addition to human intelligence and time on the surface,
the third key element to explore Mars is mobility. Mars is a
very big place, with a surface area equal to all Earth's land
masses combined. Sites of scientific interest are likely to
be far apart. The number of such sites that can be visited by
a given expedition will increase in proportion to the square
of the sortie range of the available surface transportation.
Further more, to conduct thorough investigation of a geologic
feature on Mars will require that studied can be performed at
sites that span the feature under consideration. For example,
to determine the timing and cause of fluvial erosion features
at the terminus of the Valles Marineris canyon system may
require that field sites at locations along the entire valley
system - a distance of several thousand kilometers- be
explored. It may not be necessary to cover this distance in
a single traverse, but the ability to go repeatedly to sites
and conduct intensive field studies over these distances is
clearly indicated. Here again we see the adoption of a
"dogsled" approach to Mars exploration is essential, since
only the production of propellants out of local resources can
enable the use of high powered ground rovers and ballistic
flight vehicles necessary to provide explorers with the
extensive mobility they will need.
The top priority for the first Mars explorers will be to
resolve the questions concerning the possible existence and
nature of the planet's past or present life. But, however the
answers to those questions turn out, over time new questions
will move to the fore: Will there be life on Mars? That is,
can humans settle Mars? Can we take a dead or nearly dead
planet and turn it into a new home for civilization?
Can we bring the planet to life?
Comments
Post a Comment